Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Complexity of quantum state verification in the quantum linear systems problem

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.15698 v2 pith:ZZUEBWAX submitted 2020-07-30 quant-ph

Complexity of quantum state verification in the quantum linear systems problem

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumkappastatelinearomegaproblemsystemsverification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We analyze the complexity of quantum state verification in the context of solving systems of linear equations of the form $A \vec x = \vec b$. We show that any quantum operation that verifies whether a given quantum state is within a constant distance from the solution of the quantum linear systems problem requires $q=\Omega(\kappa)$ uses of a unitary that prepares a quantum state $\left| b \right>$, proportional to $\vec b$, and its inverse in the worst case. Here, $\kappa$ is the condition number of the matrix $A$. For typical instances, we show that $q=\Omega(\sqrt \kappa)$ with high probability. These lower bounds are almost achieved if quantum state verification is performed using known quantum algorithms for the quantum linear systems problem. We also analyze the number of copies of $\left| b \right>$ required by verification procedures of the prepare and measure type. In this case, the lower bounds are quadratically worse, being $\Omega(\kappa^2)$ in the worst case and $\Omega(\kappa)$ in typical instances with high probability. We discuss the implications of our results to known variational and related approaches to this problem, where state preparation, gate, and measurement errors will need to decrease rapidly with $\kappa$ for worst-case and typical instances if error correction is not used, and present some open problems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.