Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On Extending NLP Techniques from the Categorical to the Latent Space: KL Divergence, Zipf's Law, and Similarity Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.01941 v1 pith:3PFTWJWH submitted 2020-12-02 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords spacecategoricallatentlearningtechniqueswordcomparedistance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the recent successes of deep learning in natural language processing (NLP), there remains widespread usage of and demand for techniques that do not rely on machine learning. The advantage of these techniques is their interpretability and low cost when compared to frequently opaque and expensive machine learning models. Although they may not be be as performant in all cases, they are often sufficient for common and relatively simple problems. In this paper, we aim to modernize these older methods while retaining their advantages by extending approaches from categorical or bag-of-words representations to word embeddings representations in the latent space. First, we show that entropy and Kullback-Leibler divergence can be efficiently estimated using word embeddings and use this estimation to compare text across several categories. Next, we recast the heavy-tailed distribution known as Zipf's law that is frequently observed in the categorical space to the latent space. Finally, we look to improve the Jaccard similarity measure for sentence suggestion by introducing a new method of identifying similar sentences based on the set cover problem. We compare the performance of this algorithm against several baselines including Word Mover's Distance and the Levenshtein distance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools