Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Costs to Consider in Adopting NLP for Your Business

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.08958 v2 pith:4CDJOEUI submitted 2020-12-16 cs.CL

Costs to Consider in Adopting NLP for Your Business

classification cs.CL
keywords costmodelsbusinessclassicaldeeponesperformanceacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have largely pushed deep transformer-based models as the go-to state-of-the-art technique without much regard to the production and utilization cost. Companies planning to adopt these methods into their business face difficulties because of the lack of machine, data, and human resources to build them. We compare both the performance and the cost of classical learning algorithms to the latest ones in common sequence and text labeling tasks. In our industrial datasets, we find that classical models often perform on par with deep neural ones despite the lower cost. We show the trade-off between performance gain and the cost across the models to give more insights for AI-pivoting business. Further, we call for more research into low-cost models, especially for under-resourced languages.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.