Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Representation of Context-Specific Causal Models with Observational and Interventional Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.09271 v4 pith:C4OLC2IN submitted 2021-01-22 math.ST math.COstat.MEstat.MLstat.TH

Representation of Context-Specific Causal Models with Observational and Interventional Data

classification math.ST math.COstat.MEstat.MLstat.TH
keywords modelscontext-specificcstreesdatainterventionalcstreedagsgeneral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We address the problem of representing context-specific causal models based on both observational and experimental data collected under general (e.g. hard or soft) interventions by introducing a new family of context-specific conditional independence models called CStrees. This family is defined via a novel factorization criterion that allows for a generalization of the factorization property defining general interventional DAG models. We derive a graphical characterization of model equivalence for observational CStrees that extends the Verma and Pearl criterion for DAGs. This characterization is then extended to CStree models under general, context-specific interventions. To obtain these results, we formalize a notion of context-specific intervention that can be incorporated into concise graphical representations of CStree models. We relate CStrees to other context-specific models, showing that the families of DAGs, CStrees, labeled DAGs and staged trees form a strict chain of inclusions. We end with an application of interventional CStree models to a real data set, revealing the context-specific nature of the data dependence structure and the soft, interventional perturbations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.