REVIEW 2 cited by
STEP: Segmenting and Tracking Every Pixel
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The task of assigning semantic classes and track identities to every pixel in a video is called video panoptic segmentation. Our work is the first that targets this task in a real-world setting requiring dense interpretation in both spatial and temporal domains. As the ground-truth for this task is difficult and expensive to obtain, existing datasets are either constructed synthetically or only sparsely annotated within short video clips. To overcome this, we introduce a new benchmark encompassing two datasets, KITTI-STEP, and MOTChallenge-STEP. The datasets contain long video sequences, providing challenging examples and a test-bed for studying long-term pixel-precise segmentation and tracking under real-world conditions. We further propose a novel evaluation metric Segmentation and Tracking Quality (STQ) that fairly balances semantic and tracking aspects of this task and is more appropriate for evaluating sequences of arbitrary length. Finally, we provide several baselines to evaluate the status of existing methods on this new challenging dataset. We have made our datasets, metric, benchmark servers, and baselines publicly available, and hope this will inspire future research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Forget, Anticipate and Adapt: Test Time Training for Long Videos
FFN performs TTT on multi-hour videos by restricting updates to three frames and using a surprise metric for adaptive window sizing, plus a new EpicTours dataset.
-
Adapting Vision-Language Models Without Labels: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey that organizes unsupervised vision-language model adaptation by unlabeled-data availability into four paradigms: data-free transfer, domain transfer, episodic test-time, and online test-time adaptation.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.