Logic Embeddings for Complex Query Answering
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:5CPE64C2record.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Answering logical queries over incomplete knowledge bases is challenging because: 1) it calls for implicit link prediction, and 2) brute force answering of existential first-order logic queries is exponential in the number of existential variables. Recent work of query embeddings provides fast querying, but most approaches model set logic with closed regions, so lack negation. Query embeddings that do support negation use densities that suffer drawbacks: 1) only improvise logic, 2) use expensive distributions, and 3) poorly model answer uncertainty. In this paper, we propose Logic Embeddings, a new approach to embedding complex queries that uses Skolemisation to eliminate existential variables for efficient querying. It supports negation, but improves on density approaches: 1) integrates well-studied t-norm logic and directly evaluates satisfiability, 2) simplifies modeling with truth values, and 3) models uncertainty with truth bounds. Logic Embeddings are competitively fast and accurate in query answering over large, incomplete knowledge graphs, outperform on negation queries, and in particular, provide improved modeling of answer uncertainty as evidenced by a superior correlation between answer set size and embedding entropy.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Neural Scalable Symbolic Search Framework for Complex Logical Queries with Multiple Free Variables
NS3 approximates joint ranking for EFO_k queries on KGs by merging free variables into hypernodes, pruning domains with dynamic budget B, and reducing to EFO_{k-1} queries, improving joint performance on three dataset...
-
StaRPO: Stability-Augmented Reinforcement Policy Optimization
StaRPO improves LLM reasoning by adding autocorrelation function and path efficiency stability metrics to RL policy optimization, yielding higher accuracy and fewer logic errors on reasoning benchmarks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.