Pith. sign in

REVIEW

High-productivity, high-performance workflow for virus-scale electrostatic simulations with Bempp-Exafmm

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.01048 v3 pith:Y7N62WTT submitted 2021-03-01 physics.comp-ph cs.CEphysics.bio-ph

classification physics.comp-phcs.CEphysics.bio-ph
keywords boundaryresultscodecomputationalelementsmillionperformanceapbs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Biomolecular electrostatics is key in protein function and the chemical processes affecting it. Implicit-solvent models via the Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) equation provide insights with less computational cost than atomistic models, making large-system studies -- at the scale of viruses -- accessible to more researchers. Here we present a high-productivity and high-performance linear PB solver based on Exafmm, a fast multipole method library, and Bempp, a Galerkin boundary element method package. The workflow integrates an easy-to-use Python interface with optimized computational kernels, and can be run interactively via Jupyter notebooks, for faster prototyping. Our results show the capability of the software, confirm code correctness, and assess performance with between 8,000 and 2 million elements. Showcasing the power of this interactive computing platform, we study the conditioning of two variants of the boundary integral formulation with just a few lines of code. Mesh-refinement studies confirm convergence as $1/N$, for $N$ boundary elements, and a comparison with results from the trusted APBS code using various proteins shows agreement. Our binding energy calculations using 9 various complexes align with the results from using five other grid-based PB solvers. Performance results include timings, breakdowns, and computational complexity. Exafmm offers evaluation speeds of just a few seconds for tens of millions of points, and $\mathcal{O}(N)$ scaling. The trend observed in our performance comparison with APBS demonstrates the advantage of Bempp-Exafmm in applications involving larger structures or requiring higher accuracy. Computing the solvation free energy of a Zika virus, represented by 1.6 million atoms and 10 million boundary elements, took 80-min runtime on a single compute node (dual 20-core).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools