Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Weakly-Labeled Rand Index

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.04872 v2 pith:CUA37GMS submitted 2021-03-08 cs.CV cs.LGeess.IV

classification cs.CVcs.LGeess.IV
keywords indexweakly-labeleddataimageryrandregionsapproachappropriately
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Synthetic Aperture Sonar (SAS) surveys produce imagery with large regions of transition between seabed types. Due to these regions, it is difficult to label and segment the imagery and, furthermore, challenging to score the image segmentations appropriately. While there are many approaches to quantify performance in standard crisp segmentation schemes, drawing hard boundaries in remote sensing imagery where gradients and regions of uncertainty exist is inappropriate. These cases warrant weak labels and an associated appropriate scoring approach. In this paper, a labeling approach and associated modified version of the Rand index for weakly-labeled data is introduced to address these issues. Results are evaluated with the new index and compared to traditional segmentation evaluation methods. Experimental results on a SAS data set containing must-link and cannot-link labels show that our Weakly-Labeled Rand index scores segmentations appropriately in reference to qualitative performance and is more suitable than traditional quantitative metrics for scoring weakly-labeled data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools