REVIEW 2 cited by
Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic Regularization
read the original abstract
Many modern approaches to offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) utilize behavior regularization, typically augmenting a model-free actor critic algorithm with a penalty measuring divergence of the policy from the offline data. In this work, we propose an alternative approach to encouraging the learned policy to stay close to the data, namely parameterizing the critic as the log-behavior-policy, which generated the offline data, plus a state-action value offset term, which can be learned using a neural network. Behavior regularization then corresponds to an appropriate regularizer on the offset term. We propose using a gradient penalty regularizer for the offset term and demonstrate its equivalence to Fisher divergence regularization, suggesting connections to the score matching and generative energy-based model literature. We thus term our resulting algorithm Fisher-BRC (Behavior Regularized Critic). On standard offline RL benchmarks, Fisher-BRC achieves both improved performance and faster convergence over existing state-of-the-art methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision-Making?
Return-conditional diffusion models for policies outperform offline RL on benchmarks by circumventing dynamic programming and enable constraint or skill composition.
-
Value Flows
Value Flows fits the full return distribution in RL with a flow-matching critic and reweights its learning objective by estimated return variance; the central theoretical guarantee does not follow from the stated equations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.