pith. sign in

arxiv: 2103.11909 · v7 · pith:2XWA2FYAnew · submitted 2021-03-22 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI· cs.DL

Identifying Machine-Paraphrased Plagiarism

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AIcs.DL
keywords spinbotspinnerchiefachievedcasesmachine-paraphrasedmodelsresearchtext
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Employing paraphrasing tools to conceal plagiarized text is a severe threat to academic integrity. To enable the detection of machine-paraphrased text, we evaluate the effectiveness of five pre-trained word embedding models combined with machine-learning classifiers and eight state-of-the-art neural language models. We analyzed preprints of research papers, graduation theses, and Wikipedia articles, which we paraphrased using different configurations of the tools SpinBot and SpinnerChief. The best-performing technique, Longformer, achieved an average F1 score of 81.0% (F1=99.7% for SpinBot and F1=71.6% for SpinnerChief cases), while human evaluators achieved F1=78.4% for SpinBot and F1=65.6% for SpinnerChief cases. We show that the automated classification alleviates shortcomings of widely-used text-matching systems, such as Turnitin and PlagScan. To facilitate future research, all data, code, and two web applications showcasing our contributions are openly available at https://github.com/jpwahle/iconf22-paraphrase.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.