REVIEW 1 cited by
Improving data-driven model-independent reconstructions and updated constraints on dark energy models from Horndeski cosmology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Improving data-driven model-independent reconstructions and updated constraints on dark energy models from Horndeski cosmology
abstract
In light of the statistical performance of cosmological observations, in this work we present an improvement on the Gaussian reconstruction of the Hubble parameter data $H(z)$ from Cosmic Chronometers, Supernovae Type Ia and Clustering Galaxies in a model-independent way in order to use them to study new constraints in the Horndeski theory of gravity. First, we have found that the prior used to calibrate the Pantheon supernovae data significantly affects the reconstructions, leading to a 13$\sigma $ tension on the $H_0$ value. Second, according to the $\chi^{2}$-statistics, the reconstruction carried out by the Pantheon data calibrated using the $H_{0} $ value measured by The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program is the reconstruction which fits best the observations of Cosmic Chronometers and Clustering of Galaxies datasets. Finally, we use our reconstructions of $H(z)$ to impose model-independent constraints in dark energy scenarios as Quintessence and K-essence from general cosmological viable Horndeski models, landscape in where we found that a Horndeski model of the K-essence type can reproduce the reconstructions of the late expansion of the universe within 2$\sigma$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Cosmo-Learn: code for learning cosmology using different methods and mock data
An open-source toolkit that simulates late-universe cosmological observations and benchmarks MCMC, genetic algorithms, Gaussian processes, Bayesian ridge regression, and neural networks in one pipeline.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.