REVIEW 2 cited by
Practical Defences Against Model Inversion Attacks for Split Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We describe a threat model under which a split network-based federated learning system is susceptible to a model inversion attack by a malicious computational server. We demonstrate that the attack can be successfully performed with limited knowledge of the data distribution by the attacker. We propose a simple additive noise method to defend against model inversion, finding that the method can significantly reduce attack efficacy at an acceptable accuracy trade-off on MNIST. Furthermore, we show that NoPeekNN, an existing defensive method, protects different information from exposure, suggesting that a combined defence is necessary to fully protect private user data.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Revisiting the Privacy Risks of Split Inference: A GAN-Based Data Reconstruction Attack via Progressive Feature Optimization
PFO improves GAN-based split-inference reconstruction via progressive intermediate-feature optimization, but its quantitative claims rest on internally inconsistent metric tables.
-
Split and Aggregation Learning for Foundation Models Over Mobile Embodied AI Network (MEAN): A Comprehensive Survey
The paper surveys split and aggregation learning for foundation models in 6G networks to improve efficiency, resource use, and data privacy in distributed AI.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.