Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Critical Evaluation of Failure in a Nearshore Outsourcing Project: What dilemma analysis can tell us

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.10899 v1 pith:EQWL7VA7 submitted 2021-05-23 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords projectanalysisdilemmaapproachcriticalevaluative-criticalnearshorenovopay
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Global Software Engineering (GSE) research contains few examples consciously applying what Glass and colleagues have termed an 'evaluative-critical' approach. In this study we apply dilemma analysis to conduct a critical review of a major (and ongoing) nearshore Business Process Outsourcing project in New Zealand. The project has become so troubled that a Government Minister has recently been assigned responsibility for troubleshooting it. The 'Novopay' project concerns the implementation of a nationwide payroll system responsible for the payment of some 110,000 teachers and education sector staff. An Australian company won the contract for customizing and implementing the Novopay system, taking over from an existing New Zealand service provider. We demonstrate how a modified form of dilemma analysis can be a powerful technique for highlighting risks and stakeholder impacts from empirical data, and that adopting an evaluative-critical approach to such projects can usefully highlight tensions and barriers to satisfactory project outcomes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools