Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Knowing More About Questions Can Help: Improving Calibration in Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.01494 v1 pith:XWP5HQZ2 submitted 2021-06-02 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords calibrationmodelquestiongainsaccuracyansweransweringapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study calibration in question answering, estimating whether model correctly predicts answer for each question. Unlike prior work which mainly rely on the model's confidence score, our calibrator incorporates information about the input example (e.g., question and the evidence context). Together with data augmentation via back translation, our simple approach achieves 5-10% gains in calibration accuracy on reading comprehension benchmarks. Furthermore, we present the first calibration study in the open retrieval setting, comparing the calibration accuracy of retrieval-based span prediction models and answer generation models. Here again, our approach shows consistent gains over calibrators relying on the model confidence. Our simple and efficient calibrator can be easily adapted to many tasks and model architectures, showing robust gains in all settings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools