Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Salvage of Supervision in Weakly Supervised Object Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.04073 v2 pith:4UZXIGPC submitted 2021-06-08 cs.CV

Salvage of Supervision in Weakly Supervised Object Detection

classification cs.CV
keywords wsoddetectionfsodobjectsupervisedsupervisiontextweak
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Weakly supervised object detection~(WSOD) has recently attracted much attention. However, the lack of bounding-box supervision makes its accuracy much lower than fully supervised object detection (FSOD), and currently modern FSOD techniques cannot be applied to WSOD. To bridge the performance and technical gaps between WSOD and FSOD, this paper proposes a new framework, Salvage of Supervision (SoS), with the key idea being to harness every potentially useful supervisory signal in WSOD: the weak image-level labels, the pseudo-labels, and the power of semi-supervised object detection. This paper proposes new approaches to utilize these weak and noisy signals effectively, and shows that each type of supervisory signal brings in notable improvements, outperforms existing WSOD methods (which mainly use only the weak labels) by large margins. The proposed SoS-WSOD method also has the ability to freely use modern FSOD techniques. SoS-WSOD achieves 64.4 $m\text{AP}_{50}$ on VOC2007, 61.9 $m\text{AP}_{50}$ on VOC2012 and 16.6 $m\text{AP}_{50:95}$ on MS-COCO, and also has fast inference speed. Ablations and visualization further verify the effectiveness of SoS.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.