The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2106.04480 · v3 · pith:FRRWBJQH · submitted 2021-06-08 · cs.LG · cs.AI

There Is No Turning Back: A Self-Supervised Approach for Reversibility-Aware Reinforcement Learning

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:FRRWBJQHrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords actionseventslearningorderreversibilityagentscontrolirreversible
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We propose to learn to distinguish reversible from irreversible actions for better informed decision-making in Reinforcement Learning (RL). From theoretical considerations, we show that approximate reversibility can be learned through a simple surrogate task: ranking randomly sampled trajectory events in chronological order. Intuitively, pairs of events that are always observed in the same order are likely to be separated by an irreversible sequence of actions. Conveniently, learning the temporal order of events can be done in a fully self-supervised way, which we use to estimate the reversibility of actions from experience, without any priors. We propose two different strategies that incorporate reversibility in RL agents, one strategy for exploration (RAE) and one strategy for control (RAC). We demonstrate the potential of reversibility-aware agents in several environments, including the challenging Sokoban game. In synthetic tasks, we show that we can learn control policies that never fail and reduce to zero the side-effects of interactions, even without access to the reward function.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Unsolved Problems in ML Safety

    cs.LG 2021-09 accept novelty 6.0

    The paper presents a roadmap that identifies four unsolved problems in ML safety: robustness against hazards, monitoring for hazards, alignment of model goals with human intent, and systemic safety.