Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Machine Learning for Postprocessing Ensemble Streamflow Forecasts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.09547 v3 pith:RLIF2LF3 submitted 2021-06-15 cs.LG

Machine Learning for Postprocessing Ensemble Streamflow Forecasts

classification cs.LG
keywords forecastsstreamflowlearningmachinecomparedensembleflowslead
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Skillful streamflow forecasts can inform decisions in various areas of water policy and management. We integrate numerical weather prediction ensembles, distributed hydrological model and machine learning to generate ensemble streamflow forecasts at medium-range lead times (1 - 7 days). We demonstrate a case study for machine learning applications in postprocessing ensemble streamflow forecasts in the Upper Susquehanna River basin in the eastern United States. Our results show that the machine learning postprocessor can improve streamflow forecasts relative to low complexity forecasts (e.g., climatological and temporal persistence) as well as standalone hydrometeorological modeling and neural network. The relative gain in forecast skill from postprocessor is generally higher at medium-range timescales compared to shorter lead times; high flows compared to low-moderate flows, and warm-season compared to cool ones. Overall, our results highlight the benefits of machine learning in many aspects for improving both the skill and reliability of streamflow forecasts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.