Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A comparison of in- and ex situ generated shear bands in metallic glass by transmission electron microscopy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.12986 v2 pith:6FYNRIOI submitted 2021-06-24 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-ph
keywords shearsitubandsduringcoldelectronfoilformed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Shear bands originating from in situ tensile tests of Al$_{88}$Y$_{7}$Fe$_{5}$ melt-spun ribbons conducted in a transmission electron microscope are compared with ones which had formed ex situ during cold rolling. During in situ straining, the observations of a spearhead-like shear front, a meniscus-like foil thickness reduction and no apparent shear steps to accommodate strain suggest shear band initiation by a rejuvenating shear front followed by shearing along the already softened paths. This leads to necking and subsequent failure under the reduced constraint of a 2D geometry in the thin foil and thus explains the observed lack of ductility under tension. In contrast, shear bands formed during cold rolling display distinct alternating density changes and shear off-sets. An explanation for this difference may be that in situ shear bands rip before such features could develop. Moreover, both in and ex situ experiments suggest that initiation, propagation and arrest of shear bands occur during different stages.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools