REVIEW 1 cited by
Constant-roll f(R) inflation compared with Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies and swampland criteria
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Constant-roll f(R) inflation compared with Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies and swampland criteria
read the original abstract
Inflationary models derived from $f(R)$ gravity, where the scalaron rolls down with a constant rate from the top to the minimum of the effective potential, are considered. Specifically, we take into account three $f(R)$ models \textit{i.e.}\,Starobinsky $R^{2}$, $R^{2p}$ and the logarithmic corrected models. We compare the inflationary parameters derived from the models with the observational data of CMB anisotropies \textit{i.e.} the Planck and Keck/array datasets in order to find observational constraints on the parameters space. We find that although our $f(R)$ constant-roll models for $\gamma=0$ show observationally acceptable values of $r$, they do not predict favoured values of the spectral index. In particular, we have $n_{s}>1$ for the Starobinsky $R^{2}$ and $R^{2p}$ models and $0.996<n_{s}<0.999$ for logarithmic model. Finally, we study the models from the point of view of Weak Gravity Conjecture adopting the swampland criteria.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Constant-roll $\beta$-exponential inflation: Palatini formalism
A parameter scan of constant-roll β-exponential inflation in Palatini R² gravity claims agreement with ACT/Planck contours, but the derivation is undermined by algebraic sign errors and an absent non-Gaussianity calculation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.