Pith. sign in

REVIEW

sigmoidF1: A Smooth F1 Score Surrogate Loss for Multilabel Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.10566 v3 pith:2376ME7M submitted 2021-08-24 cs.LG stat.ML

sigmoidF1: A Smooth F1 Score Surrogate Loss for Multilabel Classification

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords classificationmultilabellossmetricsfunctionssigmoidf1smoothdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multiclass multilabel classification is the task of attributing multiple labels to examples via predictions. Current models formulate a reduction of the multilabel setting into either multiple binary classifications or multiclass classification, allowing for the use of existing loss functions (sigmoid, cross-entropy, logistic, etc.). Multilabel classification reductions do not accommodate for the prediction of varying numbers of labels per example and the underlying losses are distant estimates of the performance metrics. We propose a loss function, sigmoidF1, which is an approximation of the F1 score that (1) is smooth and tractable for stochastic gradient descent, (2) naturally approximates a multilabel metric, and (3) estimates label propensities and label counts. We show that any confusion matrix metric can be formulated with a smooth surrogate. We evaluate the proposed loss function on text and image datasets, and with a variety of metrics, to account for the complexity of multilabel classification evaluation. sigmoidF1 outperforms other loss functions on one text and two image datasets and several metrics. These results show the effectiveness of using inference-time metrics as loss functions for non-trivial classification problems like multilabel classification.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.