pith. sign in

arxiv: 2109.03244 · v3 · submitted 2021-09-07 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.HE· hep-ex

Muonic Boson Limits: Supernova Redux

Andrea Caputo , Georg Raffelt , Edoardo Vitagliano This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 12:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEhep-ex
keywords muon-philic bosonssupernova boundsgamma-ray backgroundaxion-like particlesmuon magnetic momenttrapping regimePrimakoff process
0
0 comments X

The pith

Supernova gamma-ray and energy limits exclude muon-philic bosons as an explanation for the muon magnetic moment anomaly above 100 keV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses updated supernova models that track muons to set new bounds on muon-philic pseudoscalars and scalars. It accounts for the two-photon interaction generated by a muon loop, which produces bosons via Primakoff scattering and lets them decay into gamma rays. For masses above 100 keV the diffuse cosmic gamma-ray background allows at most 10 to the minus 4 of a supernova's total energy to emerge as photons, which restricts the couplings to g_a below 0.9 times 10 to the minus 10 and g_phi below 0.4 times 10 to the minus 10. Inside the trapping regime the bosons form a thermal flux near the neutrino sphere, yet their rapid decays deposit energy in the surrounding star, so couplings must exceed 2 times 10 to the minus 3 or 4 times 10 to the minus 3 to stay under the 1 percent explosion-energy ceiling. These windows leave little room for the scalar coupling value near 0.4 times 10 to the minus 3 that would address the muon anomaly.

Core claim

For muon-philic bosons with masses above roughly 100 keV, the diffuse cosmic gamma-ray background caps the pseudoscalar coupling at g_a less than or equal to 0.9 times 10 to the minus 10 and the scalar coupling at g_phi less than or equal to 0.4 times 10 to the minus 10. In the trapping regime, where bosons thermalize and emerge near the neutrino sphere, couplings must satisfy g_a greater than or equal to 2 times 10 to the minus 3 and g_phi greater than or equal to 4 times 10 to the minus 3 so that their total energy stays below 10 to the minus 2 of the supernova binding energy. The scalar value around 0.4 times 10 to the minus 3 required for a muon g-2 explanation therefore lies outside the

What carries the argument

The two-photon coupling G_gamma gamma generated by a muon triangle loop, which opens Primakoff production channels and enables radiative boson decays into observable gamma rays.

If this is right

  • The globular-cluster limit on the two-photon coupling translates into g_a less than 3.1 times 10 to the minus 9 and g_phi less than 4.6 times 10 to the minus 9 for masses below 100 keV.
  • Free-streaming bosons from supernovae are bounded by both SN1987A gamma rays and the diffuse cosmic background.
  • Trapped bosons must thermalize and decay near the neutrino sphere, depositing energy that forces couplings upward to respect the explosion-energy ceiling.
  • The same logic covers the cosmological triangle region in the two-photon coupling versus mass plane for generic axion-like particles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Improved gamma-ray telescopes could probe lower couplings by tightening the diffuse-background fraction allowed from supernovae.
  • Similar energy-deposition arguments might apply to other muon-coupled particles proposed for anomalies if their masses place them in the trapping window.
  • Any viable muonic-boson solution to the g-2 discrepancy would need to operate at masses well below 100 keV or invoke production mechanisms that avoid the supernova core.

Load-bearing premise

At most one percent of a supernova's total energy release of about 3 times 10 to the 53 erg can appear in the explosion.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the muon g-2 anomaly requires a scalar coupling near 4 times 10 to the minus 4 while the diffuse gamma-ray background or a specific supernova event shows no excess photons at the level expected for that coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2109.03244 by Andrea Caputo, Edoardo Vitagliano, Georg Raffelt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Profile of the Garching muonic SN model SFHo-18.8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Constraints on the muonic Yukawa coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Cross section for the muonic Compton process with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time and radial evolution of the temperature (top [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Muonic boson luminosity of the numerical Garching [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Effective tree-level and loop-induced muon abun [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Muonic boson luminosity in the trapping limit of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Cosmic core-collapse rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The extragalactic background light (EBL) over a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Bound on the Yukawa coupling for the scalar (red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Constraints on the ALP-photon coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We derive supernova (SN) bounds on muon-philic bosons, taking advantage of the recent emergence of muonic SN models. Our main innovations are to consider scalars $\phi$ in addition to pseudoscalars $a$ and to include systematically the generic two-photon coupling $G_{\gamma\gamma}$ implied by a muon triangle loop. This interaction allows for Primakoff scattering and radiative boson decays. The globular-cluster bound $G_{\gamma\gamma}<0.67\times10^{-10}~{\rm GeV}^{-1}$ derived for axion-like particles carries over to the muonic Yukawa couplings as $g_a<3.1\times10^{-9}$ and $g_\phi< 4.6\times10^{-9}$ for $m_{a,\phi}\lesssim 100$ keV, so SN arguments become interesting mainly for larger masses. If bosons escape freely from the SN core the main constraints originate from SN1987A $\gamma$ rays and the diffuse cosmic $\gamma$-ray background. The latter allows at most $10^{-4}$ of a typical total SN energy of $E_{\rm SN}\simeq3\times10^{53}$erg to show up as $\gamma$ rays, for $m_{a,\phi}\gtrsim 100$keV implying $g_a \lesssim 0.9\times10^{-10}$ and $g_\phi \lesssim 0.4\times10^{-10}$. In the trapping regime the bosons emerge as quasi-thermal radiation from a region near the neutrino sphere and match $L_\nu$ for $g_{a,\phi}\simeq 10^{-4}$. However, the $2\gamma$ decay is so fast that all the energy is dumped into the surrounding progenitor-star matter, whereas at most $10^{-2}E_{\rm SN}$ may show up in the explosion. To suppress boson emission below this level we need yet larger couplings, $g_{a}\gtrsim 2\times10^{-3}$ and $g_{\phi}\gtrsim 4\times10^{-3}$. Muonic scalars can explain the muon magnetic-moment anomaly for $g_{\phi}\simeq 0.4\times10^{-3}$, a value hard to reconcile with SN physics despite the uncertainty of the explosion-energy bound. For generic axion-like particles, this argument covers the "cosmological triangle" in the $G_{a\gamma\gamma}$--$m_a$ parameter space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper derives updated supernova constraints on muon-philic pseudoscalars a and scalars φ, incorporating the two-photon coupling G_γγ induced by muon loops. It obtains limits from free-streaming bosons (SN1987A γ-rays and diffuse cosmic γ-ray background) for m ≳ 100 keV and from the trapping regime, where boson emission must be suppressed below 10^{-2} E_SN to avoid over-energetic explosions. The central conclusion is that the scalar coupling g_φ ≃ 0.4×10^{-3} needed for the muon g-2 anomaly lies below the trapping-regime lower bound g_φ ≳ 4×10^{-3} and is therefore difficult to reconcile with SN physics.

Significance. If the adopted 10^{-2} E_SN threshold is robust, the work supplies useful new limits on muonic bosons at masses above the globular-cluster reach and closes part of the cosmological triangle for generic ALPs. The systematic inclusion of both scalar and pseudoscalar cases plus the radiative-decay channel is a clear advance over prior SN analyses that treated only pseudoscalars.

major comments (1)
  1. [trapping-regime discussion (abstract and main text)] The trapping-regime lower bounds g_a ≳ 2×10^{-3} and g_φ ≳ 4×10^{-3} (and the consequent tension with the g-2 window) rest on the requirement that boson-decay energy deposited in the progenitor remain below 10^{-2} E_SN. This numerical factor is stated as standard supernova energetics but is neither re-derived nor subjected to a sensitivity scan over plausible fractions (0.01–0.1) anywhere in the manuscript. Because the minimal coupling scales directly with the square root of the allowed energy fraction, a modest change in the threshold would shift the bound by a comparable factor and could remove the claimed tension.
minor comments (1)
  1. [diffuse-background paragraph] The abstract quotes the diffuse-background limit as “at most 10^{-4} of a typical total SN energy”; the corresponding section should explicitly state the reference or derivation used for this 10^{-4} factor.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and positive assessment of the manuscript's significance and advances. We respond to the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The trapping-regime lower bounds g_a ≳ 2×10^{-3} and g_φ ≳ 4×10^{-3} (and the consequent tension with the g-2 window) rest on the requirement that boson-decay energy deposited in the progenitor remain below 10^{-2} E_SN. This numerical factor is stated as standard supernova energetics but is neither re-derived nor subjected to a sensitivity scan over plausible fractions (0.01–0.1) anywhere in the manuscript. Because the minimal coupling scales directly with the square root of the allowed energy fraction, a modest change in the threshold would shift the bound by a comparable factor and could remove the claimed tension.

    Authors: We agree that the 10^{-2} E_SN threshold is adopted from standard supernova energetics in the literature (as in prior axion SN analyses) rather than re-derived here, and that no explicit sensitivity scan over the fraction appears in the manuscript. The abstract already notes uncertainty in the explosion-energy bound. To address the point, the revised manuscript will include a sensitivity discussion of the sqrt(f) scaling, with explicit bounds shown for allowed fractions from 0.001 to 0.1; this will confirm that the tension with the scalar g-2 window persists for fractions up to several times 10^{-2}. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; bounds derived from external observations and standard assumptions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain uses external benchmarks (SN1987A gamma-ray limits, diffuse cosmic gamma-ray background allowing at most 10^{-4} of E_SN, globular-cluster bound on G_γγ) and adopts the 10^{-2} E_SN cap on explosion energy as a standard supernova energetics assumption without internal derivation or self-citation. No equation or step reduces a claimed prediction or bound to a fitted parameter or input defined inside the paper by construction. The muonic boson limits for free-streaming and trapping regimes follow from these external inputs applied to the muonic Yukawa couplings and implied G_γγ, without self-referential loops. This matches the default expectation of no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The bounds rest on standard QED loop calculations for the two-photon vertex, on external SN1987A and diffuse-background gamma-ray data, and on the adopted 10^{-2} E_SN explosion-energy ceiling; no new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard supernova core temperature and density profiles from recent muonic models are sufficiently accurate for order-of-magnitude production-rate estimates.
    Invoked when converting coupling strength into luminosity and when comparing to observed gamma-ray limits.
  • domain assumption At most 10^{-2} of total SN energy may appear in the explosion without violating observations.
    Used to set the lower bound on coupling in the trapping regime; stated without new derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6005 in / 1537 out tokens · 26373 ms · 2026-05-24T12:29:24.561530+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lights, Camera, Axion: Tracing Axions from Supernovae in the Diffuse $\gamma$-ray Sky

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Axions produced in supernovae generate a diffuse gamma-ray signal through conversion in magnetic fields, yielding competitive constraints on the axion-photon coupling from COMPTEL, EGRET, and Fermi-LAT data plus forec...

  2. Supernova production of axion-like particles coupling to electrons, reloaded

    hep-ph 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Updated supernova ALP production rates including semi-Compton and pair-annihilation channels yield revised bounds on electron couplings, dominated by the decay a to e+ e- gamma at small couplings.

  3. Bipartite Solution to the Lithium Problem

    hep-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    A sequential majoron-to-neutrinos decay followed by axion-like particle-to-photons decay can lower primordial lithium without exceeding deuterium limits.

  4. $L_\mu-L_\tau$ gauge bosons in beam dumps and supernovae

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Re-evaluation of sub-GeV Lμ-Lτ gauge boson constraints from beam-dump production modes and multiple supernova observables, highlighting differences from existing literature.

  5. Axion-photon conversion in transient compact stars: Systematics, constraints, and opportunities

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Analytical expressions for ALP-photon conversion in transient compact stars yield an updated bound g_aγ < 5×10^{-12} GeV^{-1} for m_a ≲ 10^{-9} eV from SN 1987A, plus sensitivity forecasts for future Galactic SN and N...

  6. Looking for Lights from the Darkness: Signals from MeV-scale Solar Axion-like Particles

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Solar axion-like particles up to 5.5 MeV produce off-axis MeV photons via two-body decay, enabling new space and terrestrial searches that could probe g_aγ down to 10^{-12} GeV^{-1}.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · cited by 6 Pith papers · 48 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    modified lumi- nosity constraint

    Volume emission vs. SB approximation In the recent literature on SN particle bounds, the SB procedure was critiqued and instead a “modified lumi- nosity constraint” was formulated for the trapping limit [6, 69] and followed in subsequent papers [49]. It was cor- rectly noted that physically the boson emission was not blackbody emission from a hypothetical ...

    work page 1978

  2. [2]

    Closely following Ref

    or by processes involving nucleons or electrons [81]. Closely following Ref. [82] we recall that the SN boson density spectrum accumulated from all cosmic epochs to- day is given by the redshift integral dna dE = ∫ ∞ 0 dz (z + 1)Fa(Ez)n′ cc(z), (58) where Fa(E) = dNa/dE is the boson number spectrum emitted by an average SN; the integral is the total num- ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Short-lived bosons As a first simple case we consider bosons that decay so fast relative to the Hubble time that we can set the decay fraction fD = 1. Moreover, to derive a first estimate of the expected γ-ray signal we assume that a fraction ζa of a typical SN energy release of ESN = 3× 1053 erg is emitted in ALPs with average energyEav. The spectrum will ...

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Long-lived bosons For bosons that decay more slowly—and this will be the case for some of the interesting mass range for muonic bosons—we expand the decay fraction fD and use the predicted photon density of Eq. (66). Otherwise we can go through the same steps where the main difference is that the result now depends on the emission spectrum which sets the s...

    work page

  5. [5]

    V D and then of course decay by the loop-induced two-photon coupling

    Simplified estimates We now turn to our main case of interest, muonic (pseudo)scalars that are emitted from SN cores by the photo production processes of Sec. V D and then of course decay by the loop-induced two-photon coupling. The analysis is fully analogous, except that the SN emission now derives from photoproduction on muons. We will go through the st...

    work page

  6. [6]

    cosmological triangle,

    Full numerical distributions In order to verify the quality of these simple approxi- mations, we now proceed to directly evaluate Eq. (62) in full generality, using the numerical boson fluxes together with the complete cosmic core-collapse rate n′ cc(z). To show the maximum plausible effect we use the n′ cc of Madau and Dickinson who provided a total core c...

    work page 2094

  7. [7]

    Bollig, Muon Creation and Effects in Supernovae , https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1435391

    R. Bollig, Muon Creation and Effects in Supernovae , https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1435391. PhD Thesis, Technical University Munich, 2018

    work page arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Muon Creation in Supernova Matter Facilitates Neutrino-driven Explosions

    R. Bollig, H.-T. Janka, A. Lohs, G. Mart´ ınez-Pinedo, C. J. Horowitz and T. Melson, Muon creation in supernova matter facilitates neutrino-driven explosions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 242702 [ 1706.04630]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Bollig, W

    R. Bollig, W. DeRocco, P. W. Graham and H.-T. Janka, Muons in supernovae: Implications for the axion-muon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 051104 [2005.07141]. Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 189901. We refer to their consolidated post-publication update arXiv.2005.07141v6

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    G. G. Raffelt, Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics. University of Chicago Press, 1996

    work page 1996

  11. [11]

    G. G. Raffelt, Particle physics from stars , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 49 (1999) 163 [ hep-ph/9903472]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  12. [12]

    J. H. Chang, R. Essig and S. D. McDermott, Supernova 1987A constraints on sub-GeV dark sectors, millicharged particles, the QCD axion, and an axion-like particle, JHEP 09 (2018) 051 [ 1803.00993]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Croon, G

    D. Croon, G. Elor, R. K. Leane and S. D. McDermott, Supernova muons: New constraints on Z′ bosons, axions and ALPs , JHEP 01 (2021) 107 [ 2006.13942]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    J. A. Dror, R. Laha and T. Opferkuch, Probing muonic forces with neutron star binaries , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 023005 [ 1909.12845]

    work page arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Kumar Poddar, S

    T. Kumar Poddar, S. Mohanty and S. Jana, Vector gauge boson radiation from compact binary systems in a gauged Lµ−Lτ scenario, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 123023 [1908.09732]

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model

    T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model , Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [ 2006.04822]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Abi et al., Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys

    Muon g-2 Collaboration, B. Abi et al., Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [2104.03281]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Reevaluation of the Hadronic Contributions to the Muon g-2 and to alpha(MZ)

    M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the Hadronic Contributions to the Muon g-2 and to alpha(MZ) , Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1515 [ 1010.4180]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 72, 1874 (2012)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g-2 and alpha(mZ) using newest hadronic cross-section data

    M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g− 2 and α(m2 Z) using newest hadronic cross-section data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 827 [1706.09436]. 29

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Davier, A

    M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(m2 Z), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 241 [1908.00921]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 80, 410 (2020)]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    C.-Y. Chen, M. Pospelov and Y.-M. Zhong, Muon beam experiments to probe the dark sector , Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 115005 [ 1701.07437]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Constraints on a very light CP-odd Higgs of the NMSSM and other axion-like particles

    S. Andreas, O. Lebedev, S. Ramos-Sanchez and A. Ringwald, Constraints on a very light CP-odd Higgs of the NMSSM and other axion-like particles , JHEP 08 (2010) 003 [ 1005.3978]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    Carenza, O

    P. Carenza, O. Straniero, B. D¨ obrich, M. Giannotti, G. Lucente and A. Mirizzi, Constraints on the coupling with photons of heavy axion-like-particles from Globular Clusters, Phys. Lett. B 809 (2020) 135709 [2004.08399]

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    P. F. Depta, M. Hufnagel and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Updated BBN constraints on electromagnetic decays of MeV-scale particles, JCAP 04 (2021) 011 [2011.06519]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    New CAST Limit on the Axion-Photon Interaction

    CAST Collaboration, V. Anastassopoulos et al., New CAST limit on the axion-photon interaction , Nature Phys. 13 (2017) 584 [ 1705.02290]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    G. G. Raffelt, Astrophysical axion bounds, Lect. Notes Phys. 741 (2008) 51 [ hep-ph/0611350]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  27. [27]

    Revisiting the bound on axion-photon coupling from Globular Clusters

    A. Ayala, I. Dom´ ınguez, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and O. Straniero, Revisiting the bound on axion-photon coupling from Globular Clusters , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 191302 [ 1406.6053]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, P. A. Zyla et al., Review of Particle Physics , PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    S. W. Falk and D. N. Schramm, Limits from supernovae on neutrino radiative lifetimes , Phys. Lett. B 79 (1978) 511

    work page 1978

  30. [30]

    S. M. Lisakov, L. Dessart, D. J. Hillier, R. Waldman and E. Livne, Progenitors of low-luminosity Type II-Plateau supernovae, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 473 (2018) 3863 [ 1709.08673]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    On The Intrinsic Diversity of Type II-Plateau Supernovae

    O. Pejcha and J. L. Prieto, On the intrinsic diversity of type II-plateau supernovae , Astrophys. J. 806 (2015) 225 [1501.06573]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    The Nickel Mass Distribution of Normal Type II Supernovae

    T. M¨ uller, J. L. Prieto, O. Pejcha and A. Clocchiatti, The nickel mass distribution of normal type II supernovae, Astrophys. J. 841 (2017) 127 [1702.00416]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [33]

    Evolution of the Crab nebula in a low energy supernova

    H. Yang and R. A. Chevalier, Evolution of the Crab nebula in a low energy supernova , Astrophys. J. 806 (2015) 153 [ 1505.03211]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Stockinger et al., Three-dimensional models of core-collapse supernovae from low-mass progenitors with implications for Crab , Mon

    G. Stockinger et al., Three-dimensional models of core-collapse supernovae from low-mass progenitors with implications for Crab , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 496 (2020) 2039 [ 2005.02420]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Emission line models for the lowest-mass core collapse supernovae. I: Case study of a 9 $M_\odot$ one-dimensional neutrino-driven explosion

    A. Jerkstrand, T. Ertl, H.-T. Janka, E. M¨ uller, T. Sukhbold and S. E. Woosley, Emission line models for the lowest-mass core collapse supernovae. I: Case study of a 9 M⊙ one-dimensional neutrino-driven explosion, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 475 (2018) 277 [1710.04508]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, Limits to the radiative decays of neutrinos and axions from γ-ray observations of SN 1987A , Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 509

    work page 1989

  37. [37]

    E. L. Chupp, W. T. Vestrand and C. Reppin, Experimental limits on the radiative decay of SN 1987A neutrinos , Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 (1989) 505

    work page 1989

  38. [38]

    Oberauer, C

    L. Oberauer, C. Hagner, G. Raffelt and E. Rieger, Supernova bounds on neutrino radiative decays , Astropart. Phys. 1 (1993) 377

    work page 1993

  39. [39]

    Decay photons from the ALP burst of type-II supernovae

    J. Jaeckel, P. C. Malta and J. Redondo, Decay photons from the axionlike particles burst of type II supernovae , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 055032 [ 1702.02964]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Calore, P

    F. Calore, P. Carenza, M. Giannotti, J. Jaeckel and A. Mirizzi, Bounds on axionlike particles from the diffuse supernova flux , Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 123005 [2008.11741]

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Solar axion flux from the axion-electron coupling

    J. Redondo, Solar axion flux from the axion-electron coupling, JCAP 1312 (2013) 008 [ 1310.0823]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Budnik, O

    R. Budnik, O. Davidi, H. Kim, G. Perez and N. Priel, Searching for a solar relaxion or scalar particle with XENON1T and LUX , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 095021 [1909.02568]

    work page arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    J. A. Grifols and E. Mass´ o,Constraints on finite-range baryonic and leptonic forces from stellar evolution , Phys. Lett. B 173 (1986) 237

    work page 1986

  44. [44]

    Itzykson and J

    C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory , International Series In Pure and Applied Physics. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980

    work page 1980

  45. [45]

    G. G. Raffelt, Astrophysical axion bounds diminished by screening effects, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 897

    work page 1986

  46. [46]

    Bosonic super-WIMPs as keV-scale dark matter

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz and M. B. Voloshin, Bosonic super-WIMPs as keV-scale dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 115012 [ 0807.3279]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    J. A. Grifols, E. Mass´ o and S. Peris,Energy loss from the Sun and red giants: Bounds on short-range baryonic and leptonic forces , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 311

    work page 1989

  48. [48]

    Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles

    M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Collider probes of axion-like particles , JHEP 12 (2017) 044 [1708.00443]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    HIGGS BOSON PRODUCTION AT THE LHC

    M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz and P. M. Zerwas, Higgs boson production at the LHC , Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 17 [ hep-ph/9504378]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  50. [50]

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 102 (2018) 89 [ 1801.08127]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [51]

    Sikivie, Experimental tests of the invisible axion , Phys

    P. Sikivie, Experimental tests of the invisible axion , Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1415. Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 695

    work page 1983

  52. [52]

    Raffelt and L

    G. Raffelt and L. Stodolsky, Mixing of the photon with low mass particles , Phys. Rev. D 37 (1988) 1237

    work page 1988

  53. [53]

    J. W. Brockway, E. D. Carlson and G. G. Raffelt, SN 1987A gamma-ray limits on the conversion of pseudoscalars, Phys. Lett. B 383 (1996) 439 [astro-ph/9605197]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  54. [54]

    Revisiting the SN1987A gamma-ray limit on ultralight axion-like particles

    A. Payez, C. Evoli, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and A. Ringwald, Revisiting the SN 1987A gamma-ray limit on ultralight axion-like particles , JCAP 02 (2015) 006 [ 1410.3747]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Lucente, P

    G. Lucente, P. Carenza, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti and A. Mirizzi, Heavy axion-like particles and core-collapse supernovae: constraints and impact on the explosion mechanism, JCAP 12 (2020) 008 [ 2008.04918]

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    J. R. Ellis and K. A. Olive, Constraints on light particles from supernova SN 1987A , Phys. Lett. B 193 (1987) 525. 30

    work page 1987

  57. [57]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. Seckel, Bounds on exotic particle interactions from SN 1987A , Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1793

    work page 1988

  58. [58]

    M. S. Turner, Axions from SN 1987A , Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1797

    work page 1988

  59. [59]

    Burrows, M

    A. Burrows, M. T. Ressell and M. S. Turner, Axions and SN 1987A: Axion trapping , Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3297

    work page 1990

  60. [60]

    Neutrino-driven Explosions

    H.-T. Janka, Neutrino-driven explosions, Handbook of Supernovae (2017) 1095 [ 1702.08825]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Burrows and D

    A. Burrows and D. Vartanyan, Core-collapse supernova explosion theory, Nature 589 (2021) 29 [ 2009.14157]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Supernova Neutrinos: Production, Oscillations and Detection

    A. Mirizzi, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, N. Saviano, K. Scholberg, R. Bollig, L. H¨ udepohl and S. Chakraborty, Supernova neutrinos: Production, oscillations and detection , Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39 (2016) 1 [1508.00785]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    G. G. Raffelt, Astrophysical methods to constrain axions and other novel particle phenomena , Phys. Rept. 198 (1990) 1

    work page 1990

  64. [64]

    Mayle, J

    R. Mayle, J. R. Wilson, J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive, D. N. Schramm and G. Steigman, Constraints on axions from SN 1987A , Phys. Lett. B 203 (1988) 188

    work page 1988

  65. [65]

    Mayle, J

    R. Mayle, J. R. Wilson, J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive, D. N. Schramm and G. Steigman, Updated constraints on axions from SN 1987A , Phys. Lett. B 219 (1989) 515

    work page 1989

  66. [66]

    Burrows, M

    A. Burrows, M. S. Turner and R. P. Brinkmann, Axions and SN 1987A , Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 1020

    work page 1989

  67. [67]

    N. Bar, K. Blum and G. D’Amico, Is there a supernova bound on axions? , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 123025 [1907.05020]

    work page arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Cigan et al., High angular resolution ALMA images of dust and molecules in the SN 1987A ejecta , Astrophys

    P. Cigan et al., High angular resolution ALMA images of dust and molecules in the SN 1987A ejecta , Astrophys. J. 886 (2019) 51 [ 1910.02960]

    work page arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    D. Page, M. V. Beznogov, I. Garibay, J. M. Lattimer, M. Prakash and H.-T. Janka, NS 1987A in SN 1987A , Astrophys. J. 898 (2020) 125 [ 2004.06078]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Garching core-collapse supernova research archive, https: //wwwmpa.mpa-garching.mpg.de/ccsnarchive/

    work page

  71. [71]

    Radiation hydrodynamics with neutrinos: Variable Eddington factor method for core-collapse supernova simulations

    M. Rampp and H.-T. Janka, Radiation hydrodynamics with neutrinos: Variable Eddington factor method for core collapse supernova simulations , Astron. Astrophys. 396 (2002) 361 [ astro-ph/0203101]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  72. [72]

    Exploring the relativistic regime with Newtonian hydrodynamics: An improved effective gravitational potential for supernova simulations

    A. Marek, H. Dimmelmeier, H.-T. Janka, E. M¨ uller and R. Buras, Exploring the relativistic regime with Newtonian hydrodynamics: An Improved effective gravitational potential for supernova simulations , Astron. Astrophys. 445 (2006) 273 [astro-ph/0502161]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  73. [73]

    Engel, D

    J. Engel, D. Seckel and A. Hayes, Emission and detectability of hadronic axions from SN 1987A , Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 960

    work page 1990

  74. [74]

    Reduced Neutrino Opacities and the SN 1987A Signal

    W. Keil, H.-T. Janka and G. Raffelt, Reduced neutrino opacities and the SN 1987A signal , Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 6635 [ hep-ph/9410229]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  75. [75]

    J. H. Chang, R. Essig and S. D. McDermott, Revisiting Supernova 1987A Constraints on Dark Photons, JHEP 01 (2017) 107 [ 1611.03864]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    S. E. Woosley, SN 1987A: After the Peak , Astrophys. J. 330 (1988) 218

    work page 1988

  77. [77]

    A. Sung, H. Tu and M.-R. Wu, New constraint from supernova explosions on light particles beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 121305 [1903.07923]

    work page arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    D. J. Forrest, E. L. Chupp, J. M. Ryan, M. L. Cherry, I. U. Gleske, C. Reppin, K. Pinkau, E. Rieger, G. Kanbach, R. L. Kinzer, G. Share, W. N. Johnson and J. D. Kurfess, The gamma ray spectrometer for the Solar Maximum Mission. , Solar Physics 65 (1980) 15

    work page 1980

  79. [79]

    Comment on Neutrino Radiative Decay Limits from the Infrared Background

    G. G. Raffelt, Comment on “New Limits to the infrared background: Bounds on radiative neutrino decay and on contributions of very massive objects to the dark matter problem” , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 4020 [astro-ph/9808299]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  80. [80]

    Carenza, C

    P. Carenza, C. Evoli, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and D. Montanino, Turbulent axion-photon conversions in the Milky Way , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 023003 [2104.13935]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.