Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Robust Multi-Robot Active Target Tracking Against Sensing and Communication Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.09838 v1 pith:K7EKZNBQ submitted 2021-09-20 cs.RO cs.DScs.GTcs.MA

Robust Multi-Robot Active Target Tracking Against Sensing and Communication Attacks

classification cs.RO cs.DScs.GTcs.MA
keywords attackstrackingrattsensingtargetrobustcommunicationmulti-robot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The problem of multi-robot target tracking asks for actively planning the joint motion of robots to track targets. In this paper, we focus on such target tracking problems in adversarial environments, where attacks or failures may deactivate robots' sensors and communications. In contrast to the previous works that consider no attacks or sensing attacks only, we formalize the first robust multi-robot tracking framework that accounts for any fixed numbers of worst-case sensing and communication attacks. To secure against such attacks, we design the first robust planning algorithm, named Robust Active Target Tracking (RATT), which approximates the communication attacks to equivalent sensing attacks and then optimizes against the approximated and original sensing attacks. We show that RATT provides provable suboptimality bounds on the tracking quality for any non-decreasing objective function. Our analysis utilizes the notations of curvature for set functions introduced in combinatorial optimization. In addition, RATT runs in polynomial time and terminates with the same running time as state-of-the-art algorithms for (non-robust) target tracking. Finally, we evaluate RATT with both qualitative and quantitative simulations across various scenarios. In the evaluations, RATT exhibits a tracking quality that is near-optimal and superior to varying non-robust heuristics. We also demonstrate RATT's superiority and robustness against varying attack models (e.g., worst-case and bounded rational attacks).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.