Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the Complementarity between Pre-Training and Back-Translation for Neural Machine Translation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.01811 v1 pith:LO4AJHI6 submitted 2021-10-05 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords complementaritytranslationback-translationmachineneuralpre-traininganalysesavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pre-training (PT) and back-translation (BT) are two simple and powerful methods to utilize monolingual data for improving the model performance of neural machine translation (NMT). This paper takes the first step to investigate the complementarity between PT and BT. We introduce two probing tasks for PT and BT respectively and find that PT mainly contributes to the encoder module while BT brings more benefits to the decoder. Experimental results show that PT and BT are nicely complementary to each other, establishing state-of-the-art performances on the WMT16 English-Romanian and English-Russian benchmarks. Through extensive analyses on sentence originality and word frequency, we also demonstrate that combining Tagged BT with PT is more helpful to their complementarity, leading to better translation quality. Source code is freely available at https://github.com/SunbowLiu/PTvsBT.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools