REVIEW 5 cited by
Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Heterogeneous tabular data are the most commonly used form of data and are essential for numerous critical and computationally demanding applications. On homogeneous data sets, deep neural networks have repeatedly shown excellent performance and have therefore been widely adopted. However, their adaptation to tabular data for inference or data generation tasks remains challenging. To facilitate further progress in the field, this work provides an overview of state-of-the-art deep learning methods for tabular data. We categorize these methods into three groups: data transformations, specialized architectures, and regularization models. For each of these groups, our work offers a comprehensive overview of the main approaches. Moreover, we discuss deep learning approaches for generating tabular data, and we also provide an overview over strategies for explaining deep models on tabular data. Thus, our first contribution is to address the main research streams and existing methodologies in the mentioned areas, while highlighting relevant challenges and open research questions. Our second contribution is to provide an empirical comparison of traditional machine learning methods with eleven deep learning approaches across five popular real-world tabular data sets of different sizes and with different learning objectives. Our results, which we have made publicly available as competitive benchmarks, indicate that algorithms based on gradient-boosted tree ensembles still mostly outperform deep learning models on supervised learning tasks, suggesting that the research progress on competitive deep learning models for tabular data is stagnating. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-depth overview of deep learning approaches for tabular data; as such, this work can serve as a valuable starting point to guide researchers and practitioners interested in deep learning with tabular data.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second
TabPFN is a Prior-Data Fitted Network that approximates Bayesian inference for small tabular classification by training a Transformer once on synthetic data drawn from a causal prior, then solves new tasks in a single...
-
AXIL: Exact Instance Attribution for Gradient Boosting
AXIL computes exact fixed-structure instance attributions for squared-error GBMs via a matrix-free O(TN) backward operator, outperforming BoostIn/TREX/LeafInfluence on 20 regression datasets.
-
FairDiffuseVQVAE: Sampling-Time Fairness in Tabular Diffusion via Conditional Refinement of Vector-Quantized Latents
FairDiffuseVQVAE reaches state-of-the-art fairness on the standard tabular benchmark (DPR 0.702, EOR 0.686) by uniform protected-attribute sampling at inference, paying ~15 AUC points of utility.
-
Fuzzy Convolution Neural Networks for Tabular Data Classification
FCNN maps tabular features to fuzzy memberships, arranges them as images, and uses CNNs to classify, reporting competitive or superior results versus DT, SVM, FNN, Bayes, and RF on six generated noisy datasets.
-
On the Impact of Class Imbalance on the Learning Dynamics of Deep Neural Networks:An Intuitive Insight
Class imbalance causes DNNs to underfit minority classes early in training and produce non-generalizable minority representations later by overfitting to minimize overall loss.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.