pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.03506 · v5 · pith:UMXSNNEKnew · submitted 2024-06-04 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Fuzzy Convolution Neural Networks for Tabular Data Classification

Arun D. Kulkarni This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords fuzzy convolution neural networktabular datafuzzy membershipimage conversionCNN classificationnoisy datasets
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mapping tabular features to fuzzy memberships and converting them to images enables CNNs to classify non-image data competitively.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a fuzzy convolution neural network (FCNN) designed for classifying tabular data using CNN techniques. Feature values are mapped to fuzzy memberships, which are then transformed into images to train the CNN model. This framework is tested on six generated complex noisy datasets with a 70-30 train-test split. Results indicate that the FCNN achieves performance that is competitive with or better than decision trees, support vector machines, fuzzy neural networks, Bayes classifiers, and random forests. A sympathetic reader would care because it suggests a way to apply powerful image-based deep learning models to common structured data in fields like medicine and finance.

Core claim

The FCNN model maps feature values to fuzzy memberships, converts the fuzzy membership vectors into images, and uses these images to train a CNN for classifying unknown feature vectors, demonstrating that this approach can effectively learn meaningful representations from tabular data and achieve competitive or superior performance compared to existing machine learning methods on noisy datasets.

What carries the argument

The conversion of fuzzy membership vectors derived from tabular features into images that CNNs can process to capture local patterns.

If this is right

  • The FCNN can be applied to tabular data in bioinformatics, finance, and medicine.
  • It provides a method to capture local patterns within feature vectors using CNNs.
  • The model serves as a viable alternative for tabular data classification tasks.
  • Deep learning techniques can be leveraged in structured data analysis through this transformation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could be extended to other types of non-image data beyond tabular formats.
  • Testing the method on real-world datasets from the mentioned fields would provide further validation.
  • Hybrid fuzzy-deep learning models might find uses in additional classification problems.

Load-bearing premise

Mapping feature values to fuzzy memberships and converting the vectors into images preserves the information needed to distinguish classes accurately.

What would settle it

If the FCNN shows lower accuracy than random forest or SVM on the test portions of the six generated noisy datasets, the claim of competitive or superior performance would be challenged.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2406.03506 by Arun D. Kulkarni.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The confusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recently, convolution neural networks (CNNs) have attracted a great deal of attention due to their remarkable performance in various domains, particularly in image and text classification tasks. However, their application to tabular data classification remains underexplored. There are many fields such as bioinformatics, finance, medicine where nonimage data are prevalent. Adaption of CNNs to classify nonimage data remains highly challenging. This paper investigates the efficacy of CNNs for tabular data classification, aiming to bridge the gap between traditional machine learning approaches and deep learning techniques. We propose a novel framework fuzzy convolution neural network (FCNN) tailored specifically for tabular data to capture local patterns within feature vectors. In our approach, we map feature values to fuzzy memberships. The fuzzy membership vectors are converted into images that are used to train the CNN model. The trained CNN model is used to classify unknown feature vectors. To validate our approach, we generated six complex noisy data sets. We used randomly selected seventy percent samples from each data set for training and thirty percent for testing. The data sets were also classified using the state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms such as the decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), fuzzy neural network (FNN), Bayes classifier, and Random Forest (RF). Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed model can effectively learn meaningful representations from tabular data, achieving competitive or superior performance compared to existing methods. Overall, our finding suggests that the proposed FCNN model holds promise as a viable alternative for tabular data classification tasks, offering a fresh prospective and potentially unlocking new opportunities for leveraging deep learning in structured data analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Fuzzy Convolutional Neural Network (FCNN) framework for tabular data classification. Feature values are mapped to fuzzy memberships, the resulting vectors are converted into images, and a CNN is trained on these images to classify new feature vectors. The approach is evaluated on six author-generated synthetic noisy datasets (70/30 train/test split) against baselines including DT, SVM, FNN, Bayes classifier, and RF, with the claim that FCNN learns meaningful representations and achieves competitive or superior performance.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold after proper documentation and testing, the work could offer a practical bridge between CNNs and tabular data, which is relevant for domains like bioinformatics, finance, and medicine. The fuzzy-to-image conversion idea is a distinct technical choice that, if shown to preserve discriminative information across heterogeneous features, would be a useful contribution to the literature on adapting image-based deep learning to structured data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and throughout): the central empirical claim that FCNN 'can effectively learn meaningful representations' and is 'competitive or superior' cannot be evaluated because the manuscript supplies no equations or pseudocode for the fuzzy membership mapping function, no description of the image-construction procedure (e.g., how 1-D membership vectors become 2-D images, resolution, channel handling), no CNN architecture details, and no training hyperparameters or loss function.
  2. [Experiments] Experiments section: evaluation is restricted to six author-generated synthetic noisy datasets whose generation process is not described in detail. No results are reported on standard real-world tabular benchmarks that contain mixed numeric/categorical features, missing values, or non-stationary distributions typical of the cited application domains.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract and results: no statistical significance tests, confidence intervals, or multiple-run variance are mentioned for the performance comparisons, making it impossible to determine whether reported gains are reliable or merely due to the particular synthetic noise model.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'fresh prospective' should read 'fresh perspective'.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states 'randomly selected seventy percent samples' but does not specify whether the split is stratified or whether any preprocessing (normalization, handling of categorical variables) is applied before the fuzzy mapping step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve technical clarity, experimental rigor, and statistical reporting.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and throughout): the central empirical claim that FCNN 'can effectively learn meaningful representations' and is 'competitive or superior' cannot be evaluated because the manuscript supplies no equations or pseudocode for the fuzzy membership mapping function, no description of the image-construction procedure (e.g., how 1-D membership vectors become 2-D images, resolution, channel handling), no CNN architecture details, and no training hyperparameters or loss function.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript currently lacks these essential technical details, which prevents full evaluation and reproducibility. The revised version will add the mathematical definition of the fuzzy membership mapping, pseudocode for the vector-to-image conversion process (specifying resolution, channel handling, and arrangement), a complete description of the CNN architecture (layers, filters, activation functions), and all training hyperparameters together with the loss function. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experiments] Experiments section: evaluation is restricted to six author-generated synthetic noisy datasets whose generation process is not described in detail. No results are reported on standard real-world tabular benchmarks that contain mixed numeric/categorical features, missing values, or non-stationary distributions typical of the cited application domains.

    Authors: The synthetic datasets were chosen to enable controlled study of noise effects on the fuzzy-to-image transformation. We acknowledge that this limits generalizability claims. In the revision we will fully document the data-generation procedure and add results on at least two publicly available real-world tabular datasets that include mixed feature types. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and results: no statistical significance tests, confidence intervals, or multiple-run variance are mentioned for the performance comparisons, making it impossible to determine whether reported gains are reliable or merely due to the particular synthetic noise model.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of variance estimates and statistical tests weakens the reliability assessment. The revised manuscript will report mean performance and standard deviation over multiple independent runs and will include appropriate statistical significance tests (e.g., paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests) with confidence intervals for the comparisons. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; purely empirical proposal with no derivation chain or self-referential steps.

full rationale

The paper describes a method (fuzzy membership mapping of tabular features to image-like inputs for CNN training) and validates it via direct experiments on six synthetic noisy datasets using a 70/30 train/test split, with comparisons to DT, SVM, FNN, Bayes, and RF. No equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, uniqueness theorems, or self-citations appear in the text. The central claim of competitive performance is supported by external benchmark comparisons rather than reducing to its own inputs by construction. This is the most common honest non-finding for an applied empirical paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method description is purely procedural at a high level.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5813 in / 1181 out tokens · 26099 ms · 2026-05-24T00:08:54.897040+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey

    V. Borisov, T. Leemann, K. Seßler, J. Haug, M. Pawelczyk, and G. Kasneci. “Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2022. (accepted for publication) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.01889

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.01889 2022

  2. [2]

    Convolutional Neural Networks on Tabular Datasets (Part 1)

    V. Martin, “Convolutional Neural Networks on Tabular Datasets (Part 1)”, 2021. https://medium.com/spikelab/convolutional -neural- networks-on-tabular-datasets-part-1-4abdd67795b6

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Multispectral Image Analysis Using Convolution Neural Networks ,

    A. D. Kulkarni, “Multispectral Image Analysis Using Convolution Neural Networks ,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications , vol. 14, no. 10, 2023, pp. 13 -19. doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0141002

    work page doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0141002 2023

  4. [4]

    R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern classification. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Mitchell, Machine Learning , WCB/McGraw -Hill, Boston, MA, 1997, pp

    T. Mitchell, Machine Learning , WCB/McGraw -Hill, Boston, MA, 1997, pp. 52-80

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction,

    Y. Song, Y. Lu, “Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction,” Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 25;27(2):130-5. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002 -0829.215044. PMID: 26120265; PMCID: PMC4466856

    work page doi:10.11919/j.issn.1002 2015

  7. [7]

    Machine Learning 45(1), 5–32 (Oct 2001)

    I. Breiman. “Random Forests.” Machine Learning, vol 45, 2001, pp. 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 2001

  8. [8]

    Vapnik, and S

    V. Vapnik, and S. Kotz, (2006). Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data. 2006 doi: 10.2307/2988246

    work page doi:10.2307/2988246 2006

  9. [9]

    Mehlig, Machine learning with neural networks: an introduction for scientists and engineers

    B. Mehlig, Machine learning with neural networks: an introduction for scientists and engineers. Cambridge University Press, 2021

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks

    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, G. Hinton, “ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.” Adv Neural Inf Process Syst

    work page

  11. [11]

    https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001284

    work page doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001284 1943

  12. [12]

    Deep learning,

    Y. LeCun, Y. Bengin, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, 2015, pp. 436-444,

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Deep convolution neural networks for image classification: A comprehensive review,

    W. Rawat, and Z. Wang, “Deep convolution neural networks for image classification: A comprehensive review,” Neural Computation, vol. 29, 2017, pp. 2352-2449

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Deep Learning based Recommender System: A Survey and New Perspectives,

    S. Zhang, L. Yaq, A. Sun, Y. Tay, “Deep Learning based Recommender System: A Survey and New Perspectives,” ACM Computing Surveys, 2018, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-35

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Abbas, M

    Q. Abbas, M. Ibrahim, M. Jaffar (2019) A comprehensive review of recent advances in deep vision systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2019, vol. 52, pp 39–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9633-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10462-018-9633-3 2019

  16. [16]

    A survey of the re cent architectures of deep convolutional neural networks

    A. Khan, A. Sohail, U. Zahoora, A. S. Qureshi, “A Survey of the Recent Architectures of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” Artificial Intelligence Review , 2020, vol. 53, pp. 5455 –5516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09825-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09825-6 2020

  17. [17]

    Deep Neuro‑Fuzzy System application trends, challenges, and future perspectives: a systematic survey,

    N. Talpur, S. J. Abdulkadir, H. Alhussian, M. Hilmi Hasan, N. Aziz, A. Bamhdi. “Deep Neuro‑Fuzzy System application trends, challenges, and future perspectives: a systematic survey,” Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, vol. 56, pp 865–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10188-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10462-022-10188-3 2023

  18. [18]

    Online deep fuzzy learning for control of nonlinear systems using expert knowledge,

    A. Sarabakha, E. Kayacan E, “Online deep fuzzy learning for control of nonlinear systems using expert knowledge,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 28, no. 7, 2019, pp. 1492–1503. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2936787

    work page doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2019.2936787 2019

  19. [19]

    Survey on fuzzy deep neural networks

    R. Das, S. Sen, and U. Maulik, “Survey on fuzzy deep neural networks.” ACM Comput. Survey , vol. 53, no. 3, May 2020. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3369798

    work page doi:10.1145/3369798 2020

  20. [20]

    B. Sun, L. Yang, P. Dong, W. Zhang, J. Dong, and C. Young. ‘‘Super characters: A conversion from sentiment classification to image classification,” 2018, arXiv:1810.07653

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Deep Insight: A methodology to transform a non -image data to an image for convolution neural network architecture

    A. Sharma, E. Vans, D. Shigemizu, K. A. Boroevich, and T. Tsunoda, “Deep Insight: A methodology to transform a non -image data to an image for convolution neural network architecture.” Nature Sci Rep vol. 9, 2019, pp. 11399

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Slippage boosted spectral cleaning in a seeded free - electron laser ,

    Zhu, Y., Brettin, T., Xia, F. et al.,” Converting tabular data into images for deep learning with convolutional neural networks .” Nature Sci Rep, vol. 11, 2021, pp.11325 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598 -021- 90923-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598 2021

  23. [23]

    TabularNet: A Neural Network Architecture for Understanding Semantic Structures of Tabular Data,

    L. Du, et al, “TabularNet: A Neural Network Architecture for Understanding Semantic Structures of Tabular Data,” KDD ’21, August 14–18, 2021, Virtual Event, Singapore, pp 322-331

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning.,

    S. O. Arik and T. Pfister, “TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning.,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 8, 2021, pp. 6679 -6687. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826

    work page doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 2021

  25. [25]

    Weighted Tabular Method for Convolutional Neural Networks Convolutional Neural Networks ,

    Md. I. Iqbal et al.: Dynamic “Weighted Tabular Method for Convolutional Neural Networks Convolutional Neural Networks ,” IEEE Access, vol 10,2022, pp 134183- 134198

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    A comparative analysis of converters of tabular data into image for the classification of Arboviruses using Convolutional Neural Networks ,

    N. I. Medeiros, N. S. Rogerio da Silva, P. T. Endo, “A comparative analysis of converters of tabular data into image for the classification of Arboviruses using Convolutional Neural Networks ,” PLoS ONE 2023, vol.18, no. 12: 2023, e0295598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295598

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295598 2023

  27. [27]

    Graph Neural Networks for Tabular Data Learning: A Survey with Taxonomy & Directions,

    C.-T. Li, Y.-C. Tsai, C.-Y. Chen, J. C. Liao. “Graph Neural Networks for Tabular Data Learning: A Survey with Taxonomy & Directions,”

    work page

  28. [28]

    https://github.com/Roytsai27/awesome-GNN4TDL

    work page

  29. [29]

    A. D. Kulkarni, Computer Vision, and Fuzzy Neural Systems . 2001, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. ‘‘Deep residual learning for image recognition,’ in Proceeding of. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2016, pp. 770–778

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    6 functions for generating artificial datasets

    J. Kools, “6 functions for generating artificial datasets”, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/41459-6- functions-for-generating-artificial-datasets, MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved March 7, 2024. ARUN KULKARNI obtained M. Tech. and Ph.D. degrees from the Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, and was a post -doctoral fellow at ...

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3479882 2024