Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Calibrated decoders for experimental quantum error correction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.04285 v1 pith:L3OUVPVN submitted 2021-10-08 quant-ph

Calibrated decoders for experimental quantum error correction

classification quant-ph
keywords errorpost-selectionquantumdecoderseventsmeasurementstimes10calibrated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Arbitrarily long quantum computations require quantum memories that can be repeatedly measured without being corrupted. Here, we preserve the state of a quantum memory, notably with the additional use of flagged error events. All error events were extracted using fast, mid-circuit measurements and resets of the physical qubits. Among the error decoders we considered, we introduce a perfect matching decoder that was calibrated from measurements containing up to size-4 correlated events. To compare the decoders, we used a partial post-selection scheme shown to retain ten times more data than full post-selection. We observed logical errors per round of $2.2\pm0.1\times10^{-2}$ (decoded without post-selection) and $5.1\pm0.7\times10^{-4}$ (full post-selection), which was less than the physical measurement error of $7\times10^{-3}$ and therefore surpasses a pseudo-threshold for repeated logical measurements.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.