pith. sign in

arxiv: 2112.06412 · v1 · pith:FHYZOHFFnew · submitted 2021-12-13 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

A Survey of Toxic Comment Classification Methods

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords toxicaccuracymodelsbayesbuildconsequenceslstmmethods
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

While in real life everyone behaves themselves at least to some extent, it is much more difficult to expect people to behave themselves on the internet, because there are few checks or consequences for posting something toxic to others. Yet, for people on the other side, toxic texts often lead to serious psychological consequences. Detecting such toxic texts is challenging. In this paper, we attempt to build a toxicity detector using machine learning methods including CNN, Naive Bayes model, as well as LSTM. While there has been numerous groundwork laid by others, we aim to build models that provide higher accuracy than the predecessors. We produced very high accuracy models using LSTM and CNN, and compared them to the go-to solutions in language processing, the Naive Bayes model. A word embedding approach is also applied to empower the accuracy of our models.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CoGate-LSTM: Prototype-Guided Feature-Space Gating for Mitigating Gradient Dilution in Imbalanced Toxic Comment Classification

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CoGate-LSTM adds prototype-guided cosine feature-space gating to a character-level BiLSTM with multi-source embeddings and focal loss, reaching 0.881 macro-F1 on Jigsaw toxic comments while using 7.3M parameters and o...