Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Successes and failures of simple statistical physics models for a network of real neurons

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.14735 v2 pith:NCH3RMAO submitted 2021-12-29 physics.bio-ph q-bio.NC

classification physics.bio-phq-bio.NC
keywords modelsactivityagreementbiologicalcomplexdetailedfailuresneurons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Biological networks exhibit complex, coordinated patterns of activity. Can these patterns be captured precisely in simple models? Here we use measurements of simultaneous activity in 1000+ neurons in the mouse brain to test the validity of models grounded in statistical physics. When cells are dense samples from a small region, we find extremely detailed quantitative agreement between theory and experiment; sparse samples from larger regions lead to model failures. These results show we can aspire to more than qualitative agreement between simplifying theoretical ideas and the detailed behavior of a complex biological system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Maximum entropy models of neuronal populations at and off criticality

    q-bio.NC 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Static maximum-entropy thermodynamics cannot distinguish avalanche-critical from supercritical neuronal cultures, though it can separate subcritical from critical/supercritical activity.

Pith tools