The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2202.08088 · v3 · pith:VGFSGSXF · submitted 2022-02-16 · cs.LG · cs.AI

Latent Outlier Exposure for Anomaly Detection with Contaminated Data

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:VGFSGSXFrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG cs.AI
keywords dataanomalyanomaliesdetectionparametersanomalousexposurelabels
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Anomaly detection aims at identifying data points that show systematic deviations from the majority of data in an unlabeled dataset. A common assumption is that clean training data (free of anomalies) is available, which is often violated in practice. We propose a strategy for training an anomaly detector in the presence of unlabeled anomalies that is compatible with a broad class of models. The idea is to jointly infer binary labels to each datum (normal vs. anomalous) while updating the model parameters. Inspired by outlier exposure (Hendrycks et al., 2018) that considers synthetically created, labeled anomalies, we thereby use a combination of two losses that share parameters: one for the normal and one for the anomalous data. We then iteratively proceed with block coordinate updates on the parameters and the most likely (latent) labels. Our experiments with several backbone models on three image datasets, 30 tabular data sets, and a video anomaly detection benchmark showed consistent and significant improvements over the baselines.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Conformal Prediction for Neural Operators: Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification in Physics Simulation

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    First application of split conformal prediction to neural operators, providing distribution-free intervals with 89.1% empirical coverage on heat conduction benchmarks and an adaptive normalized variant using MC Dropout.