Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Enabling Dynamic Convolution Neural Network Inference for Edge Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.09461 v1 pith:OGW5QGXZ submitted 2022-02-18 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords edgedynamicinferencemodelapplicationsarchitectureconvolutiondeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning applications have achieved great success in numerous real-world applications. Deep learning models, especially Convolution Neural Networks (CNN) are often prototyped using FPGA because it offers high power efficiency and reconfigurability. The deployment of CNNs on FPGAs follows a design cycle that requires saving of model parameters in the on-chip memory during High-level synthesis (HLS). Recent advances in edge intelligence require CNN inference on edge network to increase throughput and reduce latency. To provide flexibility, dynamic parameter allocation to different mobile devices is required to implement either a predefined or defined on-the-fly CNN architecture. In this study, we present novel methodologies for dynamically streaming the model parameters at run-time to implement a traditional CNN architecture. We further propose a library-based approach to design scalable and dynamic distributed CNN inference on the fly leveraging partial-reconfiguration techniques, which is particularly suitable for resource-constrained edge devices. The proposed techniques are implemented on the Xilinx PYNQ-Z2 board to prove the concept by utilizing the LeNet-5 CNN model. The results show that the proposed methodologies are effective, with classification accuracy rates of 92%, 86%, and 94% respectively

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools