Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Transferring Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Policies for Autonomous Driving using Sim-to-Real

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.11653 v1 pith:LKJVV4DE submitted 2022-03-22 cs.RO

Transferring Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Policies for Autonomous Driving using Sim-to-Real

classification cs.RO
keywords multi-agentpoliciesmethodautonomousdrivinglevelsmapporandomization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous Driving requires high levels of coordination and collaboration between agents. Achieving effective coordination in multi-agent systems is a difficult task that remains largely unresolved. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning has arisen as a powerful method to accomplish this task because it considers the interaction between agents and also allows for decentralized training -- which makes it highly scalable. However, transferring policies from simulation to the real world is a big challenge, even for single-agent applications. Multi-agent systems add additional complexities to the Sim-to-Real gap due to agent collaboration and environment synchronization. In this paper, we propose a method to transfer multi-agent autonomous driving policies to the real world. For this, we create a multi-agent environment that imitates the dynamics of the Duckietown multi-robot testbed, and train multi-agent policies using the MAPPO algorithm with different levels of domain randomization. We then transfer the trained policies to the Duckietown testbed and compare the use of the MAPPO algorithm against a traditional rule-based method. We show that the rewards of the transferred policies with MAPPO and domain randomization are, on average, 1.85 times superior to the rule-based method. Moreover, we show that different levels of parameter randomization have a substantial impact on the Sim-to-Real gap.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.