Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Ethereum Fraud Detection with Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.12363 v3 pith:A5ZQOADX submitted 2022-03-23 cs.LG cs.CRcs.SI

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.SI
keywords modelsethereumgraphmodelperformanceedgesheterogeneousnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

While transactions with cryptocurrencies such as Ethereum are becoming more prevalent, fraud and other criminal transactions are not uncommon. Graph analysis algorithms and machine learning techniques detect suspicious transactions that lead to phishing in large transaction networks. Many graph neural network (GNN) models have been proposed to apply deep learning techniques to graph structures. Although there is research on phishing detection using GNN models in the Ethereum transaction network, models that address the scale of the number of vertices and edges and the imbalance of labels have not yet been studied. In this paper, we compared the model performance of GNN models on the actual Ethereum transaction network dataset and phishing reported label data to exhaustively compare and verify which GNN models and hyperparameters produce the best accuracy. Specifically, we evaluated the model performance of representative homogeneous GNN models which consider single-type nodes and edges and heterogeneous GNN models which support different types of nodes and edges. We showed that heterogeneous models had better model performance than homogeneous models. In particular, the RGCN model achieved the best performance in the overall metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Detecting Sybil Addresses in Blockchain Airdrops: A Subgraph-based Feature Propagation and Fusion Approach

    cs.CR 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper reports that a LightGBM model with two-layer subgraph features detects Sybil airdrop addresses with precision 0.94, recall 0.92, F1 0.93, and AUC 0.98 on Binance BAB data.

  2. AI Generalisation Gap In Comorbid Sleep Disorder Staging

    cs.LG 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    EEG sleep-staging models that work on healthy subjects generalize poorly to ischemic stroke patients and attend to physiologically uninformative signal regions.

  3. Dynamic Feature Fusion: Combining Global Graph Structures and Local Semantics for Blockchain Fraud Detection

    cs.CR 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    This paper describes a GCN+BERT fusion model for blockchain fraud detection that reports state-of-the-art F1 scores, but the results are invalid because the label is included in the text input.

Pith tools