Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improving Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling method to measure inter content scale

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.13186 v1 pith:4VQZ327C submitted 2022-02-25 q-bio.NC cs.LG

classification q-bio.NCcs.LG
keywords perceptualmethodmldsscalestimulicontentdifferencelikelihood
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The goal of most subjective studies is to place a set of stimuli on a perceptual scale. This is mostly done directly by rating, e.g. using single or double stimulus methodologies, or indirectly by ranking or pairwise comparison. All these methods estimate the perceptual magnitudes of the stimuli on a scale. However, procedures such as Maximum Likelihood Difference Scaling (MLDS) have shown that considering perceptual distances can bring benefits in terms of discriminatory power, observers' cognitive load, and the number of trials required. One of the disadvantages of the MLDS method is that the perceptual scales obtained for stimuli created from different source content are generally not comparable. In this paper, we propose an extension of the MLDS method that ensures inter-content comparability of the results and shows its usefulness especially in the presence of observer errors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools