Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.01730 v1 pith:S473CDQK submitted 2022-05-03 cs.CL cs.HC

Quiz Design Task: Helping Teachers Create Quizzes with Automated Question Generation

classification cs.CL cs.HC
keywords questionteachersgenerationmetricsqgenfindhelpingmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Question generation (QGen) models are often evaluated with standardized NLG metrics that are based on n-gram overlap. In this paper, we measure whether these metric improvements translate to gains in a practical setting, focusing on the use case of helping teachers automate the generation of reading comprehension quizzes. In our study, teachers building a quiz receive question suggestions, which they can either accept or refuse with a reason. Even though we find that recent progress in QGen leads to a significant increase in question acceptance rates, there is still large room for improvement, with the best model having only 68.4% of its questions accepted by the ten teachers who participated in our study. We then leverage the annotations we collected to analyze standard NLG metrics and find that model performance has reached projected upper-bounds, suggesting new automatic metrics are needed to guide QGen research forward.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Memorization to Creation: Evaluating the Cognitive Depth of LLM-Generated Educational Questions

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Evaluation of LLMs shows that specific prompting can increase higher-order questions by 11.53% and reduce repetitiveness by 24.45% in question generation for education.