Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Pooling Revisited: Your Receptive Field is Suboptimal

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.15254 v2 pith:A5F3TYVC submitted 2022-05-30 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords receptivefielddynopoolnetworkpoolingcostmodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The size and shape of the receptive field determine how the network aggregates local information and affect the overall performance of a model considerably. Many components in a neural network, such as kernel sizes and strides for convolution and pooling operations, influence the configuration of a receptive field. However, they still rely on hyperparameters, and the receptive fields of existing models result in suboptimal shapes and sizes. Hence, we propose a simple yet effective Dynamically Optimized Pooling operation, referred to as DynOPool, which optimizes the scale factors of feature maps end-to-end by learning the desirable size and shape of its receptive field in each layer. Any kind of resizing modules in a deep neural network can be replaced by the operations with DynOPool at a minimal cost. Also, DynOPool controls the complexity of a model by introducing an additional loss term that constrains computational cost. Our experiments show that the models equipped with the proposed learnable resizing module outperform the baseline networks on multiple datasets in image classification and semantic segmentation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools