Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Towards Target Sequential Rules

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.04728 v1 pith:3ISN3UOD submitted 2022-06-09 cs.DB cs.AI

Towards Target Sequential Rules

classification cs.DB cs.AI
keywords sequentialrulesminingrulealgorithmtargettargetedtasrm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In many real-world applications, sequential rule mining (SRM) can provide prediction and recommendation functions for a variety of services. It is an important technique of pattern mining to discover all valuable rules that belong to high-frequency and high-confidence sequential rules. Although several algorithms of SRM are proposed to solve various practical problems, there are no studies on target sequential rules. Targeted sequential rule mining aims at mining the interesting sequential rules that users focus on, thus avoiding the generation of other invalid and unnecessary rules. This approach can further improve the efficiency of users in analyzing rules and reduce the consumption of data resources. In this paper, we provide the relevant definitions of target sequential rule and formulate the problem of targeted sequential rule mining. Furthermore, we propose an efficient algorithm, called targeted sequential rule mining (TaSRM). Several pruning strategies and an optimization are introduced to improve the efficiency of TaSRM. Finally, a large number of experiments are conducted on different benchmarks, and we analyze the results in terms of their running time, memory consumption, and scalability, as well as query cases with different query rules. It is shown that the novel algorithm TaSRM and its variants can achieve better experimental performance compared to the existing baseline algorithm.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.