REVIEW 1 cited by
Tensor Train for Global Optimization Problems in Robotics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The convergence of many numerical optimization techniques is highly dependent on the initial guess given to the solver. To address this issue, we propose a novel approach that utilizes tensor methods to initialize existing optimization solvers near global optima. Our method does not require access to a database of good solutions. We first transform the cost function, which depends on both task parameters and optimization variables, into a probability density function. Unlike existing approaches, the joint probability distribution of the task parameters and optimization variables is approximated using the Tensor Train model, which enables efficient conditioning and sampling. We treat the task parameters as random variables, and for a given task, we generate samples for decision variables from the conditional distribution to initialize the optimization solver. Our method can produce multiple solutions (when they exist) faster than existing methods. We first evaluate the approach on benchmark functions for numerical optimization that are hard to solve using gradient-based optimization solvers with a naive initialization. The results show that the proposed method can generate samples close to global optima and from multiple modes. We then demonstrate the generality and relevance of our framework to robotics by applying it to inverse kinematics with obstacles and motion planning problems with a 7-DoF manipulator.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
High-dimensional Optimization with Low Rank Tensor Sampling and Local Search
TESALOCS, a hybrid of tensor-train sampling and local search, reports order-of-magnitude gains over gradient-only methods on 20 100-dimensional benchmarks, though the experimental baseline is incomplete.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.