REVIEW 1 cited by
Nowhere to Hide: Detecting Obfuscated Fingerprinting Scripts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As the web moves away from stateful tracking, browser fingerprinting is becoming more prevalent. Unfortunately, existing approaches to detect browser fingerprinting do not take into account potential evasion tactics such as code obfuscation. To address this gap, we investigate the robustness of a state-of-the-art fingerprinting detection approach against various off-the-shelf obfuscation tools. Overall, we find that the combination of static and dynamic analysis is robust against different types of obfuscation. While some obfuscators are able to induce false negatives in static analysis, dynamic analysis is still able detect these cases. Since obfuscation does not induce significant false positives, the combination of static and dynamic analysis is still able to accurately detect obfuscated fingerprinting scripts.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Byte by Byte: Unmasking Browser Fingerprinting at the Function Level Using V8 Bytecode Transformers
ByteDefender uses a Transformer trained on V8 bytecode to label individual JavaScript functions as fingerprinting or not, claiming function-level detection with 4% page-load overhead.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.