Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Unsupervised Recurrent Federated Learning for Edge Popularity Prediction in Privacy-Preserving Mobile Edge Computing Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.00755 v2 pith:FAMAU6GU submitted 2022-07-02 cs.MM cs.AIcs.DCcs.LG

classification cs.MMcs.AIcs.DCcs.LG
keywords popularityedgeunsupervisedcomputingiiotmobilepredictionfederated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Nowadays wireless communication is rapidly reshaping entire industry sectors. In particular, mobile edge computing (MEC) as an enabling technology for industrial Internet of things (IIoT) brings powerful computing/storage infrastructure closer to the mobile terminals and, thereby, significant lowers the response latency. To reap the benefit of proactive caching at the network edge, precise knowledge on the popularity pattern among the end devices is essential. However, the complex and dynamic nature of the content popularity over space and time as well as the data-privacy requirements in many IIoT scenarios pose tough challenges to its acquisition. In this article, we propose an unsupervised and privacy-preserving popularity prediction framework for MEC-enabled IIoT. The concepts of local and global popularities are introduced and the time-varying popularity of each user is modelled as a model-free Markov chain. On this basis, a novel unsupervised recurrent federated learning (URFL) algorithm is proposed to predict the distributed popularity while achieve privacy preservation and unsupervised training. Simulations indicate that the proposed framework can enhance the prediction accuracy in terms of a reduced root-mean-squared error by up to $60.5\%-68.7\%$. Additionally, manual labeling and violation of users' data privacy are both avoided.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools