Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A single $T$-gate makes distribution learning hard

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.03140 v1 pith:63G2OTS7 submitted 2022-07-07 quant-ph cs.CCstat.ML

classification quant-phcs.CCstat.ML
keywords quantumcircuitsalgorithmslearningmodellingdistributionsefficientgenerative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The task of learning a probability distribution from samples is ubiquitous across the natural sciences. The output distributions of local quantum circuits form a particularly interesting class of distributions, of key importance both to quantum advantage proposals and a variety of quantum machine learning algorithms. In this work, we provide an extensive characterization of the learnability of the output distributions of local quantum circuits. Our first result yields insight into the relationship between the efficient learnability and the efficient simulatability of these distributions. Specifically, we prove that the density modelling problem associated with Clifford circuits can be efficiently solved, while for depth $d=n^{\Omega(1)}$ circuits the injection of a single $T$-gate into the circuit renders this problem hard. This result shows that efficient simulatability does not imply efficient learnability. Our second set of results provides insight into the potential and limitations of quantum generative modelling algorithms. We first show that the generative modelling problem associated with depth $d=n^{\Omega(1)}$ local quantum circuits is hard for any learning algorithm, classical or quantum. As a consequence, one cannot use a quantum algorithm to gain a practical advantage for this task. We then show that, for a wide variety of the most practically relevant learning algorithms -- including hybrid-quantum classical algorithms -- even the generative modelling problem associated with depth $d=\omega(\log(n))$ Clifford circuits is hard. This result places limitations on the applicability of near-term hybrid quantum-classical generative modelling algorithms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Comparing Classical Simulation and Sample-Based Learning of Quantum Systems

    quant-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For random MPS and Clifford+T circuits, increases in entanglement or T-count correlate with sharper loss minima and worse reconstruction under constrained neural capacity.

  2. On the Complexity of Quantum States and Circuits from the Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups

    quant-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Random states from symplectic and orthogonal unitaries show exponentially large strong state complexity and near-orthogonality, with average-case hardness for learning circuits from these groups.

  3. Comparing Classical Simulation and Sample-Based Learning of Quantum Systems

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Empirical study finds neural-network learning difficulty (via Hessian eigenvalue and random subspace optimization) correlates with classical simulation hardness parameterized by MPS bond dimension and T-gate count.

Pith tools