Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey of Explainable Graph Neural Networks: Taxonomy and Evaluation Metrics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.12599 v2 pith:TTK5ND7X submitted 2022-07-26 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords gnnsexplainablegraphnetworksneuralinterpretmademetrics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have demonstrated a significant boost in prediction performance on graph data. At the same time, the predictions made by these models are often hard to interpret. In that regard, many efforts have been made to explain the prediction mechanisms of these models from perspectives such as GNNExplainer, XGNN and PGExplainer. Although such works present systematic frameworks to interpret GNNs, a holistic review for explainable GNNs is unavailable. In this survey, we present a comprehensive review of explainability techniques developed for GNNs. We focus on explainable graph neural networks and categorize them based on the use of explainable methods. We further provide the common performance metrics for GNNs explanations and point out several future research directions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Absolute Evaluation Measures for Machine Learning: A Survey

    cs.LG 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey compiles bounded absolute evaluation metrics for classification, clustering, and ranking and proposes decision trees for metric selection, but several formulas are reproduced incorrectly.

Pith tools