Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparison of refilling schemes in the free-surface lattice Boltzmann method

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.14496 v2 pith:XF4VDBVI submitted 2022-07-29 physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph

Comparison of refilling schemes in the free-surface lattice Boltzmann method

classification physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph
keywords liquidnumericalrefillingschemeaccuracyaveragingboltzmanncells
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Simulating mobile liquid-gas interfaces with the free-surface lattice Boltzmann method (FSLBM) requires frequent re-initialization of fluid flow information in computational cells that convert from gas to liquid. The corresponding algorithm, here referred to as the refilling scheme, is crucial for the successful application of the FSLBM in terms of accuracy and numerical stability. This study compares five refilling schemes that extract information from the surrounding liquid and interface cells by averaging, extrapolating, or assuming one of the three different equilibrium states. Six numerical experiments were performed, covering a broad spectrum of possible scenarios. These include a standing gravity wave, a rectangular and cylindrical dam break, a Taylor bubble, a drop impact into liquid, and a bubbly plane Poiseuille flow. In some simulations, the averaging, extrapolation, and one equilibrium-based scheme were numerically unstable. Overall, the results have shown that the simplest equilibrium-based scheme should be preferred in terms of numerical stability, computational cost, accuracy, and ease of implementation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.