Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Pouch cells with 15% silicon calendar-aged for 4 years

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.00138 v1 pith:E3EXTJSC submitted 2022-08-31 physics.chem-ph

Pouch cells with 15% silicon calendar-aged for 4 years

classification physics.chem-ph
keywords cellsagingcalendarstoragewerewhenanodeeffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Small amounts of high-capacity silicon-based materials are already used in the anode of commercial Li-ion batteries, helping increase their energy density. Despite their remarkable storage capability, silicon continuously reacts with the electrolyte, accelerating time-dependent cell performance fade. Nevertheless, very limited information is available on the specific consequences of this reactivity for the calendar aging of Li-ion cells. Here, we analyze aging effects on 450 mAh pouch cells containing 15 wt% of Si (and 73 wt% graphite) after storage at 21 oC for four years. We show that severe losses of Si capacity occurred due to particle isolation when cells were stored at high states of charge (SOC), but not when cells were fully discharged prior to storage. Impedance rise was also significantly higher when cells were kept at high SOCs and was mostly due to phenomena taking place at the cathode; the continuous electrolyte reduction at the anode did not lead to a major increase in bulk electrode resistance. A series of post-test characterization provided additional information on the effects of time and SOC on the calendar aging of Si-containing cells. Our study highlights the many challenges posed by Si during calendar aging and can inform future studies in the field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.