Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Three Learning Stages and Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff of Restricted Boltzmann Machines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.00873 v2 pith:7M3DJR4E submitted 2022-09-02 cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nnquant-ph

classification cs.LGcond-mat.dis-nnquant-ph
keywords learningaccuracyefficiencyboltzmanndistributionmachinesprobabilityrestricted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) offer a versatile architecture for unsupervised machine learning that can in principle approximate any target probability distribution with arbitrary accuracy. However, the RBM model is usually not directly accessible due to its computational complexity, and Markov-chain sampling is invoked to analyze the learned probability distribution. For training and eventual applications, it is thus desirable to have a sampler that is both accurate and efficient. We highlight that these two goals generally compete with each other and cannot be achieved simultaneously. More specifically, we identify and quantitatively characterize three regimes of RBM learning: independent learning, where the accuracy improves without losing efficiency; correlation learning, where higher accuracy entails lower efficiency; and degradation, where both accuracy and efficiency no longer improve or even deteriorate. These findings are based on numerical experiments and heuristic arguments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools