Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Design of experiments for the calibration of history-dependent models via deep reinforcement learning and an enhanced Kalman filter

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.13126 v1 pith:I3JZMNSZ submitted 2022-09-27 cs.LG

Design of experiments for the calibration of history-dependent models via deep reinforcement learning and an enhanced Kalman filter

classification cs.LG
keywords experimentsdesignexperimentalmodelsdatausedactionsadditional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Experimental data is costly to obtain, which makes it difficult to calibrate complex models. For many models an experimental design that produces the best calibration given a limited experimental budget is not obvious. This paper introduces a deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for design of experiments that maximizes the information gain measured by Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence obtained via the Kalman filter (KF). This combination enables experimental design for rapid online experiments where traditional methods are too costly. We formulate possible configurations of experiments as a decision tree and a Markov decision process (MDP), where a finite choice of actions is available at each incremental step. Once an action is taken, a variety of measurements are used to update the state of the experiment. This new data leads to a Bayesian update of the parameters by the KF, which is used to enhance the state representation. In contrast to the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) index, which requires additional sampling to test hypotheses for forward predictions, the KF can lower the cost of experiments by directly estimating the values of new data acquired through additional actions. In this work our applications focus on mechanical testing of materials. Numerical experiments with complex, history-dependent models are used to verify the implementation and benchmark the performance of the RL-designed experiments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.