Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

COPEN: Probing Conceptual Knowledge in Pre-trained Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.04079 v1 pith:BWPV5XY2 submitted 2022-11-08 cs.CL

COPEN: Probing Conceptual Knowledge in Pre-trained Language Models

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgeconceptualplmscopenprobingcognitiondesigningentities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Conceptual knowledge is fundamental to human cognition and knowledge bases. However, existing knowledge probing works only focus on evaluating factual knowledge of pre-trained language models (PLMs) and ignore conceptual knowledge. Since conceptual knowledge often appears as implicit commonsense behind texts, designing probes for conceptual knowledge is hard. Inspired by knowledge representation schemata, we comprehensively evaluate conceptual knowledge of PLMs by designing three tasks to probe whether PLMs organize entities by conceptual similarities, learn conceptual properties, and conceptualize entities in contexts, respectively. For the tasks, we collect and annotate 24k data instances covering 393 concepts, which is COPEN, a COnceptual knowledge Probing bENchmark. Extensive experiments on different sizes and types of PLMs show that existing PLMs systematically lack conceptual knowledge and suffer from various spurious correlations. We believe this is a critical bottleneck for realizing human-like cognition in PLMs. COPEN and our codes are publicly released at https://github.com/THU-KEG/COPEN.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Trustworthy AI: Ensuring Reliability and Accountability from Models to Agents

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The thesis presents a kernel method for multiaccuracy across overlooked subpopulations, information-theoretic optimal watermarking for LLMs, and a simulator showing LLM agents outperforming humans in supply chains whi...

  2. Hessian-Enhanced Token Attribution (HETA): Interpreting Autoregressive LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    HETA is a new attribution framework for decoder-only LLMs that combines semantic transition vectors, Hessian-based sensitivity scores, and KL divergence to produce more faithful and human-aligned token attributions th...