Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Adiabatic magnon spectra with and without constraining field: Benchmark against an exact magnon spectrum

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.10958 v1 pith:7GK6P6YQ submitted 2023-02-21 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Adiabatic magnon spectra with and without constraining field: Benchmark against an exact magnon spectrum

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el
keywords magnonadiabaticspectrumconstrainingcouplingfieldmagneticbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The spectrum of magnon excitations in magnetic materials can be obtained exactly from the transverse dynamic magnetic susceptibility, which is however in practice numerically expensive. Many ab initio approaches therefore consider instead the adiabatic magnon spectrum, which assumes a separation of time scales of magnons and electronic excitations. There exist two alternative implementations for adiabatic magnon spectra: one based on the magnetic force theorem (MFT) and the other with a constraining field that enforces static non-collinear spin configurations. We benchmark both implementations against the exact magnon spectrum of an exactly solvable mean-field model. While both adiabatic methods are equally valid in the low magnon energy and strong Stoner coupling limits, we find that the constraining field method performs better than the MFT in both the cases of strong Stoner coupling and high magnon energies,while the MFT performs better for combined weak coupling and low magnon energies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.