Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Double Descent Demystified: Identifying, Interpreting & Ablating the Sources of a Deep Learning Puzzle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.14151 v1 pith:7ZW7PNAP submitted 2023-03-24 cs.LG stat.ML

Double Descent Demystified: Identifying, Interpreting & Ablating the Sources of a Deep Learning Puzzle

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords descentdoubledatalearningnumberlinearmodelsregression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Double descent is a surprising phenomenon in machine learning, in which as the number of model parameters grows relative to the number of data, test error drops as models grow ever larger into the highly overparameterized (data undersampled) regime. This drop in test error flies against classical learning theory on overfitting and has arguably underpinned the success of large models in machine learning. This non-monotonic behavior of test loss depends on the number of data, the dimensionality of the data and the number of model parameters. Here, we briefly describe double descent, then provide an explanation of why double descent occurs in an informal and approachable manner, requiring only familiarity with linear algebra and introductory probability. We provide visual intuition using polynomial regression, then mathematically analyze double descent with ordinary linear regression and identify three interpretable factors that, when simultaneously all present, together create double descent. We demonstrate that double descent occurs on real data when using ordinary linear regression, then demonstrate that double descent does not occur when any of the three factors are ablated. We use this understanding to shed light on recent observations in nonlinear models concerning superposition and double descent. Code is publicly available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Much is Brain Data Worth for Machine Learning?

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Brain data is worth a variable number of task samples depending on task-brain alignment, noise levels, and latent dimension, with conditions under which it also improves robustness to test distribution shift.

  2. Path Regularization: A Near-Complete and Optimal Nonasymptotic Generalization Theory for Multilayer Neural Networks and Double Descent Phenomenon

    cs.LG 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A nonasymptotic generalization error upper bound for path-regularized multilayer neural networks with Lipschitz losses that exhibits double descent and is near-minimax optimal for ReLU regression.

  3. Double Descent in Quantum Kernel Ridge Regression

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Quantum kernel ridge regression shows double descent in test risk, with the interpolation peak suppressible by regularization, via random matrix theory asymptotics in the high-dimensional limit.