Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evaluating GPT-4 and ChatGPT on Japanese Medical Licensing Examinations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.18027 v2 pith:HZFKVNYN submitted 2023-03-31 cs.CL

Evaluating GPT-4 and ChatGPT on Japanese Medical Licensing Examinations

classification cs.CL
keywords benchmarkllmschatgptgpt-4japanesemedicalapiscurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

As large language models (LLMs) gain popularity among speakers of diverse languages, we believe that it is crucial to benchmark them to better understand model behaviors, failures, and limitations in languages beyond English. In this work, we evaluate LLM APIs (ChatGPT, GPT-3, and GPT-4) on the Japanese national medical licensing examinations from the past five years, including the current year. Our team comprises native Japanese-speaking NLP researchers and a practicing cardiologist based in Japan. Our experiments show that GPT-4 outperforms ChatGPT and GPT-3 and passes all six years of the exams, highlighting LLMs' potential in a language that is typologically distant from English. However, our evaluation also exposes critical limitations of the current LLM APIs. First, LLMs sometimes select prohibited choices that should be strictly avoided in medical practice in Japan, such as suggesting euthanasia. Further, our analysis shows that the API costs are generally higher and the maximum context size is smaller for Japanese because of the way non-Latin scripts are currently tokenized in the pipeline. We release our benchmark as Igaku QA as well as all model outputs and exam metadata. We hope that our results and benchmark will spur progress on more diverse applications of LLMs. Our benchmark is available at https://github.com/jungokasai/IgakuQA.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. EviCare: Enhancing Diagnosis Prediction with Deep Model-Guided Evidence for In-Context Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    EviCare uses deep model-guided evidence to enhance LLM in-context reasoning for accurate diagnosis prediction from EHRs, outperforming baselines by 20.65% on average and 30.97% for novel diagnoses on MIMIC datasets.

  2. Medical Incident Causal Factors and Preventive Measures Generation Using Tag-based Example Selection in Few-shot Learning

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Tag-based few-shot selection yields higher precision and stability than random or similarity-based methods when using LLMs to analyze medical incidents.