pith. sign in

arxiv: 2304.08275 · v4 · pith:AT444KLCnew · submitted 2023-04-17 · 💻 cs.CY · cs.AI

Implementing Responsible AI: Tensions and Trade-Offs Between Ethics Aspects

classification 💻 cs.CY cs.AI
keywords aspectsprinciplesethicsinteractionstensionsaccuracycataloguedevelopers
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Many sets of ethics principles for responsible AI have been proposed to allay concerns about misuse and abuse of AI/ML systems. The underlying aspects of such sets of principles include privacy, accuracy, fairness, robustness, explainability, and transparency. However, there are potential tensions between these aspects that pose difficulties for AI/ML developers seeking to follow these principles. For example, increasing the accuracy of an AI/ML system may reduce its explainability. As part of the ongoing effort to operationalise the principles into practice, in this work we compile and discuss a catalogue of 10 notable tensions, trade-offs and other interactions between the underlying aspects. We primarily focus on two-sided interactions, drawing on support spread across a diverse literature. This catalogue can be helpful in raising awareness of the possible interactions between aspects of ethics principles, as well as facilitating well-supported judgements by the designers and developers of AI/ML systems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.